Toward the participatory human‐centred community an exploration of cyber‐physical public design for urban experience

Fu, Zhiyong; Chao, Chiju; Wang, Huan; Wang, Yandi

doi:10.1049/iet-cps.2019.0007

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this respect, another interesting research domain would be exploring the possibility of making the best of the technologies in the age of Industry 4.0 to support the process of HCD. This direction of future research would be beneficial to fulfilling the limitations—namely RL4 in Table 8 —that express different concerns: computational capability (Ceccacci et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2016 ; Leng & Jiang, 2017 ), data synchronisation (Lin, 2018 ; Peruzzini et al, 2019 ), and knowledge management (Fu et al, 2019 ; Grandi et al, 2020 ; Vanderhaegen, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2015 ).…”

Section: Discussion and Opportunities For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Smartness is a socio-technical phenomenon—in which the production processes and the products themselves are technical aspects—that impacts society’s awareness of sustainability in terms of the environmental, social, and economic aspects (Bednar & Welch, 2020 ; Fu et al, 2019 ; Gualtieri et al, 2020 ; Pereira Pessôa & Jauregui Becker, 2020 ). There will be a need for a strategic balance between shorter- and longer-term desires, values, and policies, and the interests of different groups of stakeholders.…”

Section: Human-centred Design In Industry 40mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These technologies facilitate the collection, organization, retrieval, and reuse of design knowledge in an effective manner. While Fu et al ( 2019 ) took advantage of IoT solutions (sensors) for user data collection—unintentional behaviour, emotion, culture—and artificial intelligence for data processing, Vanderhaegen ( 2019 ) and Grandi et al ( 2020 ) made use of digital and mixed reality simulation in measuring human factors—physical stress, physiological data—and evaluating their design experiments. Instead of starting from scratch, Zhu et al ( 2015 ) and Leng and Jiang ( 2017 ) established mathematically a collection of semantic commonalities derived from historical design ontology-based databases—activities, functions, concepts, process sequences—to build a knowledge platform from which a stream of new derivative products and services can be efficiently developed.…”

Section: Literature Characterization Of Human-centred Design In Industry 40mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The transition to industry 4.0 has impacted factories, but it also affects the entire value chain. In this sense, human-centred factors play a core role in transitioning to sustainable manufacturing processes and consumption. The awareness of human roles in Industry 4.0 is increasing, as evidenced by active work in developing methods, exploring influencing factors, and proving the effectiveness of design oriented to humans. However, numerous studies have been brought into existence but then disconnected from other studies. As a consequence, these studies in industry and research alike are not regularly adopted, and the network of studies is seemingly broad and expands without forming a coherent structure. This study is a unique attempt to bridge the gap through the literature characteristics and lessons learnt derived from a collection of case studies regarding human-centred design (HCD) in the context of Industry 4.0. This objective is achieved by a well-rounded systematic literature review whose special unit of analysis is given to the case studies, delivering contributions in three ways: (1) providing an insight into how the literature has evolved through the cross-disciplinary lens; (2) identifying what research themes associated with design methods are emerging in the field; (3) and setting the research agenda in the context of HCD in Industry 4.0, taking into account the lessons learnt, as uncovered by the in-depth review of case studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Opportunities For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Human-centred Design In Industry 40mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Characterization Of Human-centred Design In Industry 40mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We enumerate the different kinds of tools and methods for input collection, together with the articles that employ them, in Table 2. Uncertainty analysis Graveline et al [78] Living lab Fu et al [93] However, this type of data crowdsourcing involves moving to electronic databases, thus, making processes like PPGIS (voluntary public participatory GIS) possible. PPGIS is an emerging method of data collection in the conducted review.…”

Section: Input Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation-Based Participatory Modelling in Urban and Production Logistics: A Review on Advances and Trends

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simulation-based participatory modelling allows integration of all types of knowledge including empirical, technical and scientific from all disciplines and domains. Thus, in recent years, the use of participatory modelling has been continuously increasing in many fields including logistics. With a view of achieving better understanding of the subject, this article systematically reviews the advances made in participatory modelling in the field of urban and production logistics in the last decade. It further reports the findings transparently following a categorization based on (i) the purpose of participatory modelling in the domain, and (ii) depending on the purpose how data is collected, processed and outcomes are presented. The review resulted in 97 articles which were analysed and categorized based on the above two questions formulated in the literature surveyed. The review revealed that apart from the three existing categories of purposes, namely, reflexive, descriptive and normative there is an emerging fourth category that was analytical in nature and 15 out of 97 articles analyzed belonged to this category. The authors decided to call this category analytical field empirical modelling which is primarily based on mathematical modelling and use of computational methods. We present these results with the help of a categorization. During the analysis for the second research question, we discovered that though the conventional ways of data collection and processing, such as interviews and workshops, which remain significantly present, in electronic data crowdsourcing and data processing via computational methods are emerging.

show abstract

“…The growth of such interactions needs to be supported. With the help of technology, a future shift from a purely physical to a cyber-physical experience of public spaces is conceivable [13].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking the Public Space Design Process Using Extended Reality as a Game Changer for 3D Co-Design

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public space design processes are complex. Numerous preconditions and the involvement of stakeholders impede rapid decision making. Two-dimensional drawings remain the norm, although these are difficult for citizen stakeholders to understand. Public space designers rarely use 3D city models, infrastructure building information modeling, digital twins, or extended reality. Usually, 3D images (without animation) are only rendered after decision making for communication purposes. This study consists of an online questionnaire of 102 Flemish region (Belgium) stakeholders to show the appeal of and resistance to the use of 3D and extended reality in public space design processes. In a follow-up experiment, 37 participants evaluated various graphic techniques by their designs and observations. The questionnaire showed that all stakeholders lack experience with the use of virtual reality in design processes. We found that non-designer stakeholders and designers indicated that using virtual reality and interactive online 3D tools using game engines provided a better insight into communication and design. Reusing 3D designs in cycling simulators during the design process results in cost-effective quality optimization, and integration into digital twins or animated spatial time machines paves the way for hybrid, 4D cities. Extended reality supports 3D co-design that has simplicity and clarity from the outset of the design process, a trait that makes it a game changer.

show abstract

Toward the participatory human‐centred community an exploration of cyber‐physical public design for urban experience

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research

Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research

Simulation-Based Participatory Modelling in Urban and Production Logistics: A Review on Advances and Trends

Rethinking the Public Space Design Process Using Extended Reality as a Game Changer for 3D Co-Design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About