2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward the realization of reproducible Atomic Force Microscopy measurements of elastic modulus in biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though data in the literature is not yet fully conclusive, there is increasing evidence that individual zinc status is related to CRC risk [37], thus differences in the zinc status of healthy tissue and tumorous tissue can occur and have to be taken into account when monitoring the biomechanical properties of cancerous cells. Among these parameters, the elasticity of cells is discussed to be the most suitable biomarker for cancer [66]. Estimated elastic moduli in this study are in the same order of magnitude as expected for eukaryotic cells, varying between several hundred Pascal to 10 kPa [3,25], and are comparable to previous studies on cancerous cells with different tissue origins [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though data in the literature is not yet fully conclusive, there is increasing evidence that individual zinc status is related to CRC risk [37], thus differences in the zinc status of healthy tissue and tumorous tissue can occur and have to be taken into account when monitoring the biomechanical properties of cancerous cells. Among these parameters, the elasticity of cells is discussed to be the most suitable biomarker for cancer [66]. Estimated elastic moduli in this study are in the same order of magnitude as expected for eukaryotic cells, varying between several hundred Pascal to 10 kPa [3,25], and are comparable to previous studies on cancerous cells with different tissue origins [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The differing biomechanics of the two CRC cell lines emphasize their relevance for comprehensively screening various CRC cells [77] by using AFM to identify and characterize nanomechanical fingerprints for tumor diagnostics. This requires using standardized and reproducible experimental conditions [66], as well as considering the impact of the extracellular matrix of CRC biopsies [21] on their mechanical properties, which needs to be incorporated into the identification and validation process of biomechanical markers for CRC. To distinguish between the impact of individual cancer and of zinc status on the mechanical behavior of cells, it is important to additionally screen zinc-adequate colon cells from non-pathological colon tissues, which can be achieved using primary colon cells [78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asks for standardization protocols that could be widely applied, and that could deliver a reference set of samples produced independently in various laboratories. One of the first approaches tackling this issue has been proposed in 2015 by Demichelis et al [ 45 ]. In this work, the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material has been used to produce samples with the stiffness range of 50–5000 kPa.…”
Section: Relativeness Of Young’s Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A conventional method to determine cellular elastic modulus is to fit the force-displacement curve obtained from AFM indentation with Hertz contact model (Demichelis, et al, 2015). When an AFM indenter approaches a cell, the molecules (atoms) of the two surfaces interact mainly by Van Der Waals forces and hence the adhesion force is inevitable in cell-indenter interaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%