2001
DOI: 10.1081/pad-100104770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward Transformative Dialogue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
12

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
106
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, and unlike conversation with its strong temporal and rhetorical orientation, dialogue can be seen more as a momentary accomplishment (Cissna & Anderson, 1998). Drawing on the work of, for example, Bakhtin (1981), Buber (1958), Bohm (1996, and Eisenberg and Goodall (1993), studies of dialogue in organizations have sought to show how it is used to generate new meaning and understanding, create space in which to question and critique, and play a mediating function that can lead to a convergence of views (Gergen, 1994(Gergen, , 1999Gergen et al, 2001;Hawes, 1999;Thatchenkery & Upadhyaya, 1996).…”
Section: Discourses and Organizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, and unlike conversation with its strong temporal and rhetorical orientation, dialogue can be seen more as a momentary accomplishment (Cissna & Anderson, 1998). Drawing on the work of, for example, Bakhtin (1981), Buber (1958), Bohm (1996, and Eisenberg and Goodall (1993), studies of dialogue in organizations have sought to show how it is used to generate new meaning and understanding, create space in which to question and critique, and play a mediating function that can lead to a convergence of views (Gergen, 1994(Gergen, , 1999Gergen et al, 2001;Hawes, 1999;Thatchenkery & Upadhyaya, 1996).…”
Section: Discourses and Organizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, group dialogic practices demonstrate a form of communicative action (Habermas 1996) where meaning is never frozen or terminated, but remains in a continuous state of becoming (Gergen, McNamee and Barrett 2001). Therefore group practices are never static or in a state of completeness but rather exist as discursive, living practices, unfolding in a continuous present, shaped by often unseen hands and habits inherited from the past.…”
Section: Discussion Groups As 'Living Practice'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensemaking deals with particular settings. It's about how people create meanings intersubjectively through their embodied dialogical acts (Gergen, McNamee, & Barrett, 2001;Hosking & McNamee, 2006), they construct what they interpret (Sutcliffe, 2013). Sensemaking occurs in ongoing interactions between people, a constant substrate that shapes interpretations, "inventing a new meaning for something that has already occurred during the organizing process, but does not have a name" (Magala, 1997, p. 324).…”
Section: On Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper begins with an account on sensemaking concept, why it is helpful, underlying its implications particularly in decision making, changing processes, and emotions. As we shall see sensemaking is useful in uncertain contexts, language, discourse, being important resources for organizational interventions, aiming to expand the possibilities to look at a situation (Gergen, McNamee, & Barrett, 2001). Meaning is constructing through language (Wittgenstein, 1958), which provides the members resources for interacting with each other in socially determinate ways (Thibault, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%