2021
DOI: 10.33166/aetic.2021.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards 76-81 GHz Scalable Phase Shifting by Folded Dual-strip Shielded Coplanar Waveguide with Liquid Crystals

Abstract: Unconventional folded shielded coplanar waveguide (FS-CPW) has yet to be fully investigated for tunable dielectrics-based applications. This work formulates designs of FS-CPW based on liquid crystals (LC) for electrically controlled 0-360˚ phase shifters, featuring a minimally redundant approach for reducing the LC volume and hence the costs for mass production. The design exhibits a few conceptual features that make it stand apart from others, noteworthy, the dual-strip structure with a simplified enclosure e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of solvers in HFSS are available, differing in the computation methods, (e.g., FEM, IE, SBR+ Solver, FEBI, IE-Region, DDM, FA-DDM, Transient, CMA, and Eigenmode solvers), while CST is eminent in its time (or frequency) domain solvers based on finite integration techniques (FIT). Compared with HFSS [13] and CST [14] based simulations conducted in our previous works, the MATLAB Antenna toolbox employed in this paper is based on the frequency-domain Method of Moment (MoM) approach, which exhibits a series of advantages, i.e., suitability for quick prototyping, quasi-open source (in low cost), flexibility (in coding and tuning parameters), fast (in particular for array simulations), availability to run programmes online (via the cloud), and ease of communication among www.aetic.theiaer.org engineers with diverse technical backgrounds. It is well worth noting that existing papers using MoM-based MATLAB codes for antennas development are largely concerning microstrip patch antennas [15,16] at 2.4 GHz, whereas quarter-wave monopole antennas have seldom been reported.…”
Section: Modelling Methods and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of solvers in HFSS are available, differing in the computation methods, (e.g., FEM, IE, SBR+ Solver, FEBI, IE-Region, DDM, FA-DDM, Transient, CMA, and Eigenmode solvers), while CST is eminent in its time (or frequency) domain solvers based on finite integration techniques (FIT). Compared with HFSS [13] and CST [14] based simulations conducted in our previous works, the MATLAB Antenna toolbox employed in this paper is based on the frequency-domain Method of Moment (MoM) approach, which exhibits a series of advantages, i.e., suitability for quick prototyping, quasi-open source (in low cost), flexibility (in coding and tuning parameters), fast (in particular for array simulations), availability to run programmes online (via the cloud), and ease of communication among www.aetic.theiaer.org engineers with diverse technical backgrounds. It is well worth noting that existing papers using MoM-based MATLAB codes for antennas development are largely concerning microstrip patch antennas [15,16] at 2.4 GHz, whereas quarter-wave monopole antennas have seldom been reported.…”
Section: Modelling Methods and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%