2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a better spatial quantification of nitrogen deposition: A case study for Czech forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reviews of deposition velocities for different forest types and substances reported a large variability of vd values, which appeared to be sensitive to several parameters such as receptor surface properties, meteorological conditions as well as seasonal, and diurnal variations (Hunová et al, 2016). To account for this variability, we derived two sets of deposition velocities.…”
Section: Estimation Of Deposition Velocities For No 2 and Nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reviews of deposition velocities for different forest types and substances reported a large variability of vd values, which appeared to be sensitive to several parameters such as receptor surface properties, meteorological conditions as well as seasonal, and diurnal variations (Hunová et al, 2016). To account for this variability, we derived two sets of deposition velocities.…”
Section: Estimation Of Deposition Velocities For No 2 and Nhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike WD, which is fairly easy to assess (Staelens et al, 2008;Dämmgen et al, 2013), the quantification of ID is much more challenging. As OD is often of orographic origin, it usually only contributes significantly to TD in mountainous regions (Kirchner et al, 2014;Hunová et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly as in other regions of Europe and US [194,195], it was demonstrated that in the CR, by not considering (1) deposition path via fog and (2) unmeasured constituents of dry deposition, such as NH 3 and HNO 3 (g), the total sulphur and nitrogen depositions are likely to be underestimated substantially [196,197]. Although the chemistry of fog is regularly observed at only a few sites in the CR, and information on fog chemistry is scarce [198,199], it is widely recognised that fog in the CR is enriched as compared to rain, particularly in SO 4 2-and NO 3 - [103,104,200].…”
Section: Atmospheric Depositionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The N deposition is likely to be substantially underestimated not accounting for several important non-measured compounds, such as NH3 and HNO3 (g), and contribution of occult deposition, as recently shown by Hůnová et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%