The Sociology of Norbert Elias 2004
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511488832.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a ‘central theory’: the scope and relevance of the sociology of Norbert Elias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figurational knowledge sociology of Norbert Elias seeks to bridge the dichotomy of social structure and social change (Dunning and Hughes, 2013) by pushing for a sociological program based on relational knowledge (Quilley and Loyal, 2004). In this regard, figurations are the places where actors' knowledge is created (Elias, 2000).…”
Section: Figurational Sociology As a Perspective To Re-embed Eco-innomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The figurational knowledge sociology of Norbert Elias seeks to bridge the dichotomy of social structure and social change (Dunning and Hughes, 2013) by pushing for a sociological program based on relational knowledge (Quilley and Loyal, 2004). In this regard, figurations are the places where actors' knowledge is created (Elias, 2000).…”
Section: Figurational Sociology As a Perspective To Re-embed Eco-innomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figurational relations can be deliberately changed, quickly and at short notice, but also over long periods of time (Goudsblom, 1977;Loyal and Quilley, 2013). As such, it is necessary to reconstruct the figuration's embedding context from a socio-historical perspective (Quilley and Loyal, 2004).…”
Section: Figurational Sociology As a Perspective To Re-embed Eco-innomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Elias said that his theory of processes of civilization was ‘a comprehensive theory of human society … of the development of humanity … an integrating framework of reference for all the specialist social sciences’ (Elias, 2013[1984]: 50). As Quilley and Loyal (2004: 2–3) have rightly argued, Elias’s synthesis is a promising candidate for a central theory of society and an organizing framework to inform cumulative sociological research and interdisciplinary cross-fertilization (see also Benthem van den Bergh, 1986).…”
Section: Introduction: Elias’s Perspective As a World-viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Quilley and Loyal (2004: 1–8) have provided another justification for an appropriate central theory of society. They compared the proliferation of sub-disciplines in sociology (fields such as race, family, organizations, criminology, etc.)…”
Section: Introduction: Elias’s Perspective As a World-viewmentioning
confidence: 99%