2019
DOI: 10.1214/19-ejs1593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a complete picture of stationary covariance functions on spheres cross time

Abstract: With the advent of wide-spread global and continental-scale spatiotemporal datasets, increased attention has been given to covariance functions on spheres over time. This paper provides results for stationary covariance functions of random fields defined over d-dimensional spheres cross time. Specifically, we provide a bridge between the characterization in Berg and Porcu (2017) for covariance functions on spheres cross time and Gneiting's lemma (Gneiting, 2002) that deals with planar surfaces.We then prove th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we consider two examples based on the class of space-circular time nonseparable covariance models presented by Shirota and Gelfand (2017) (Models 4 and 5), where Model 4 ignores temporal decay and Model 5 is an example of construction (B). Then, we give two examples of nonseparable circular cross linear time covariance models, one from White and Porcu (2018) and the other from Theorem 1, where both models are multiplied by an exponential spatial covariance function Note. MAPE = mean absolute prediction error; RMSPE = root-mean-squared prediction error; CVG = prediction interval coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, we consider two examples based on the class of space-circular time nonseparable covariance models presented by Shirota and Gelfand (2017) (Models 4 and 5), where Model 4 ignores temporal decay and Model 5 is an example of construction (B). Then, we give two examples of nonseparable circular cross linear time covariance models, one from White and Porcu (2018) and the other from Theorem 1, where both models are multiplied by an exponential spatial covariance function Note. MAPE = mean absolute prediction error; RMSPE = root-mean-squared prediction error; CVG = prediction interval coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For construction (B), space-circular time nonseparability, Shirota and Gelfand (2017) propose using C 3 (h, ) =  2 (h 2 , ) to account for the interaction between circular time lags and spatial differences. Other appropriate models for C 3 (h, ) are given by theorem 2 in the work of White and Porcu (2018), which shows that C 3 (h, ) =  2 ( , h 2 ) is positive definite, and theorem 1 in the work of Porcu et al (2016), which proves that C 3 (h, ) = (h 2 , ) is a valid covariance function. The classes proposed in Porcu et al (2016) and White and Porcu (2018) can also be used for circular-linear time nonseparability (i.e., for construction (C), replace h with u to obtain C 5 ( , u)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because most real-world processes exhibit nonseparable relationships between spatial quantities or between space and time (see, e.g., Cressie & Huang, 1999;Gneiting, 2002;Gneiting, Genton, & Guttorp, 2006;Kolovos, Christakos, Hristopulos, & Serre, 2004, for similar arguments), we consider nonseparable covariance functions that could account for spatial relationships. Specifically, we adapt classes of covariance functions designed for nonseparable space-time relationships from Porcu, Bevilacqua, and Genton (2016) and White and Porcu (2018) to nonseparable space-elevation change relationships.…”
Section: A2 Model Selection Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for all d and m were shown recently in [27]. In [21], Schlather has considered diagonalized versionsG α (t) :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%