Towards a Component Composition and Interaction Architecture for the Web

Pahl, Claus; Ward, David

doi:10.1016/s1571-0661(04)80437-7

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Techniques various power and complexity have been developed to describe interfaces of components. These approaches range from abstract interface definition languages like the Balboa Interface Definition Language (BIDL) (Doucet, Shukla, Gupta, & Otsuka, 2002), over XML-based component description languages (Pahl & Ward, 2002) and logic-based specifications (Lammermann & Tyugu, 2001) to automata-based languages (de Alfaro & Henzinger, 2001) that also capture temporal aspects of component interfaces. While the goal of these techniques is to facilitate the composition of components, they generally require programming expertise and the knowledge of technical details and, as such, are not suitable for the end users.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantic Composition of Web Portal Components

Jahnke

Bychkov

Dahlem

et al. 2006

Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many recently emerging component-based Web portal application platforms allow end users to compose dynamic Web dialogues on the fly. Experts predict that this paradigm will enable a class of new applications for Web-based content delivery in information-rich, agile business domains, such as health care. We present a conceptual analysis of the user-based composition paradigm currently used and argue that its usability is limited with respect to complex dynamic applications. To overcome these limitations, we present an alternative composition paradigm, which is based on a semantic model of a portal's application domain. We evaluate this approach with an application scenario in the health care domain.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%