2020
DOI: 10.1080/20518196.2020.1712002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a definition and practice of communal archaeology: Ethics, informal learning, and citizen science in the practice of indigenous archaeology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Citizen science is an approach whereby volunteers are involved in a research project, according to a preestablished level of engagement, which often includes collecting data and working towards the project aim. Rivera-Collazo and colleagues [35] have established that citizen scientists may be contributors, collaborators, or co-creators. The community members involved in CHICC were invited to collect and record data (contributor) and make decisions in relation to the data and its use (collaborator); however, they did not determine the project's aims (co-creator).…”
Section: Disciplinary Foci and Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Citizen science is an approach whereby volunteers are involved in a research project, according to a preestablished level of engagement, which often includes collecting data and working towards the project aim. Rivera-Collazo and colleagues [35] have established that citizen scientists may be contributors, collaborators, or co-creators. The community members involved in CHICC were invited to collect and record data (contributor) and make decisions in relation to the data and its use (collaborator); however, they did not determine the project's aims (co-creator).…”
Section: Disciplinary Foci and Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is gaining popularity in heritage studies, it is not without its limitations (see overviews in [33,34]). There is varying consensus on appropriate levels of participation; Rivera-Collazo [35] and colleagues have established citizen scientist categorises, including contributor, collaborator, or co-creator. CHICC draws upon two of these three models: contributor and collaborator (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2021 ; Boger, Perdikaris, and Rivera‐Collazo 2019 ; Caron‐Beaudoin and Armstrong 2019 ; Davis, Seeber, and Sanger 2020 ; Douglass 2020 ; Pearson, Jackson, and McNamara 2021 ; Rivera‐Collazo et al. 2020 ). Given the seeds of change in archaeology and the increased political activism among archaeologists, those voices now have a channel to reach the IPCC reports.…”
Section: The Climate Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective relationships with communities have supported not only the recording of heritage, returning it to the living memory of colonized communities, but also the importance of climate engagement and activism, as shown in cases in Alaska (Hillerdal, Knecht, and Jones 2019 ; Knecht and Jones 2019 and Puerto Rico (Rivera‐Collazo 2021 ; Rivera‐Collazo et al. 2020 ).…”
Section: The Climate Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De igual manera, es una herramienta de apropiación social a partir de la cual pueden surgir más iniciativas en torno a la investigación, gestión o divulgación del patrimonio. Ejemplos de esto se pueden observar en los proyectos de ciudadanos científicos, en los cuales se busca que las comunidades participen en tres niveles: contribuidor, colaborador, co-creador (Rivera-Collazo et al 2020). Para lograr este objetivo, el inventario debe integrar no solo los datos básicos de los complejos industriales, sino también un Sistema de Información Geográfica (SIG) colaborativo (Figura 4) en el que las personas tengan la posibilidad de brindar su propia información, a partir de sus diferentes vivencias o desde su memoria individual y colectiva.…”
unclassified