2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a food safety culture improvement roadmap: diagnosis and gap analysis through a conceptual framework as the first steps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This emphasizes the significance of auditing not just the food safety management system but also the food safety culture, as it represents a crucial and integral component of an effective behavior-based food safety management system. Assessment is the first step to develop and improve food safety culture within the organization [ 36 ]. Moreover, to be successful, food safety must go beyond formal regulations to live within the culture of a company [ 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This emphasizes the significance of auditing not just the food safety management system but also the food safety culture, as it represents a crucial and integral component of an effective behavior-based food safety management system. Assessment is the first step to develop and improve food safety culture within the organization [ 36 ]. Moreover, to be successful, food safety must go beyond formal regulations to live within the culture of a company [ 63 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zanin et al [ [33] , [34] , [35] ] worked on educational actions to improve the food safety culture. In addition, Spanioli et al [ 36 ] presented the overall food safety culture diagnosis and proposed the gap analysis methodology, as the first two steps in the food safety culture improvement roadmap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food safety culture is conceptualized by several researchers [3][4][5]. In this study, a specific FSC conceptual model [6] is followed, where food safety culture consists of three building blocks: the food safety management system (based on core control and assurance activities), the human-organizational, and the human-individual building block. Assessment reveals maturity of the prevailing food safety culture in a specific food processing organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maturity of FSC, or maturity of the dimensions that build FSC, is positioned on a scale with five-point maturity scales [7] (with stage one to five, respectively, representing the stage of doubt, react to, know of, predict, and internalize) and three-point maturity scales [8] (with stage one to three, respectively, representing a reactive, active, and proactive level of maturity) being most common. When a specific FSC dimension has a low maturity score, this dimension can be considered a gap [6]. A mature food safety culture is expected to result in higher levels of (microbiological) food safety of the products produced by the company.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, nearly 50 publications devoted to measuring the culture of food safety have been written, and their extensive review is included in the work by Zanin et al (2021). Recent works include, for example, the articles by Spagnoli et al (2022) and Onojakpor et al (2022). Nevertheless, not much work is noticed on JC assessment, as the authors will write about in the next chapter of this publication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%