“…During this stage, the GEOBIA community has greatly extended the interest from land-use/land-cover mapping to many other fields, such as improving urban energy efficiency , capturing latent spatial phenomena under policy concern , and forest burn severity estimation . Accordingly, new GEOBIA algorithms were developed with emphases on analyzing novel data types (e.g., hyperspectral; Schäfer et al 2016), multi-source data integration (e.g., optical and LiDAR; Godwin, Chen, and Singh 2015), automation of scale determination (e.g., enhancing intra-segment homogeneity and inter-segment heterogeneity; Yang, He, and Weng 2015), semantic segmentation (e.g., employing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN); Marmanis et al 2016), feature selection (e.g., utilizing machine learning; Ma et al 2017), automating the adaptation and adjustment of rule sets (e.g., agent-based image analysis; Hofmann et al 2015), ontology-driven modeling (e.g., Arvor et al 2013), etc. The maturity of GEOBIA foundations, frameworks, and software allowed researchers and practitioners to effectively analyze high-resolution imagery, while research findings further published in non-remote-sensing journals, such as Journal of Environmental Management, Landscape and Urban Planning, Ecological Informatics, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, and Journal of Archaeological Science.…”