2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a framework for ecological stategic change in business networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By taking the basic assumptions of the IMP perspective and building on the earlier work of Andersson and Sweet (2002), this paper contributes to the CS literature with a typology…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By taking the basic assumptions of the IMP perspective and building on the earlier work of Andersson and Sweet (2002), this paper contributes to the CS literature with a typology…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They go on to state that collaboration with non-business actors is "a key success factor to develop the firm's resources and legitimacy in sustainable development" (Crespin-Mazet and Dontenwill, 2012, p. 208). Another example is a case study by Andersson and Sweet (2002), who analyze a food supply network with both loose and tight couplings in which the initiating firm needs to manage these existing couplings (relationships) in different ways. They state that "[…] in order to change, i.e.…”
Section: Imp 121mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Coop released a commercial in 2015 conveying its history of past resistance to dishonest trading and the company's efforts to promote improved conditions for the consumers: from breaking the price cartel on margarine in 1909, introducing declarations of content in 1946, and the dating of products in 1963, to the development of new product categories of organic food in 1986. In this way, KF and its members are portrayed as having played an important role throughout history by spearheading changes in food retailing in Sweden (Andersson and Sweet 2002). However, with alarmingly negative economic results over the last decade (Edsta and Näslund 2014), the consumer cooperative struggles to be an alternative force in Swedish retailing.…”
Section: Empirical Context: the Consumer Cooperative In Swedish Food mentioning
confidence: 99%