2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijkms.2010.029785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a framework for Knowledge Management in Project Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Codification is a process of making tacit knowledge explicit (Oluikpe et al, 2010). Nonaka and Takeuchi's (1995) knowledge spiral or SECI Model expostulated the concept of tacit and explicit knowledge and the interplay of both in knowledge work.…”
Section: Codificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Codification is a process of making tacit knowledge explicit (Oluikpe et al, 2010). Nonaka and Takeuchi's (1995) knowledge spiral or SECI Model expostulated the concept of tacit and explicit knowledge and the interplay of both in knowledge work.…”
Section: Codificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early days of KM when organizations began reporting the value of knowledge management in improving organizational processes, it was difficult to put objective measures to these claims. Today, however, we have KM maturity models (APQC, 2010), Intellectual Capital concepts (Edvinsson and Malone, 1997), the SECI model (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995), Tan et al's (2006) model, the CRAI Model (Oluikpe et al, 2010) and other KM processes that clarify the knowledge agenda and how these create value for organizations. Carrillo et al (2003) linked knowledge management to business performance therefore providing a justification for organizations to adopt a KM strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KM solves scheduling problems (Rokou et al, 2012), underpins risk management (Neves et al, 2014), improves project cost and quality management (Suresh et al, 2017). Several benefits of KM applied to PM are recognized in the literature, among other KM have an positive impact on lead time, innovation, project success, operational efficiency and generation of new knowledge, and other benefits (Oluikpe et al, 2010;Wu, Chen, 2010). On the other hand, a lack of KM has on projects, namely it is: inefficiency, repetition of mistakes and a lack of lessons learned (Suresh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Knowledge Management and Project Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also individual empirical results confirming that KM positively effects the sustainability of enterprise operations and that companies which promote creating, sharing and implementing new knowledge are more likely to engage in sustainable development practices (Kumari, Saharan, 2020;Sun et al, 2022). Some studies indicate that KM improves project management (PM) efficiency and effectiveness (Hu et al, 2019;Oluikpe et al, 2010). However, it is still an under-research topic (Moutinho, Silva, 2022;Todorović et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%