2012 IEEE 55th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.2012.6291983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a fully integrated electronic nose SoC

Abstract: Electronic noses (e-nose) have been studied for several years and extensively applied; however, they are limited by their volume and high manufacturing cost. Portable devices have become popular in recent years; therefore, it is crucial to integrate e-noses in portable devices (e.g., mobile phones). This study used TSMC 90nm 1P9M CMOS MSG technology to develop a front-end system-on-chip (SoC) for an electronic nose. The SoC contained interdigitated electrodes, multi-channel sensor interface circuits, an analog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This power consumption for the olfactory neuron module was much lower compared to the power consumption for the conversion circuits to transfer data from the sensor to the processors in an E‐nose chip. [ 55–57 ] Note that P peak (not P avg ) is similar to the power consumption of interface circuits and ADCs in the conventional E‐nose chip, although P peak includes the power consumed in the sensor part, indicating a large power reduction (Table S2, Supporting Information). However, further development of ultralow power gas sensors will help the reduction of power consumption of the entire gas sensing module, because the major power consumption occurs in the microheater for the SMO gas sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This power consumption for the olfactory neuron module was much lower compared to the power consumption for the conversion circuits to transfer data from the sensor to the processors in an E‐nose chip. [ 55–57 ] Note that P peak (not P avg ) is similar to the power consumption of interface circuits and ADCs in the conventional E‐nose chip, although P peak includes the power consumed in the sensor part, indicating a large power reduction (Table S2, Supporting Information). However, further development of ultralow power gas sensors will help the reduction of power consumption of the entire gas sensing module, because the major power consumption occurs in the microheater for the SMO gas sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different electronic noses already exist. However, they are usually not fully handheld systems as they require a personal computer type system to exploit the measurements [4]. Another drawback is their cost, about few thousands of dollars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%