2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops 2012
DOI: 10.1109/percomw.2012.6197634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a fuzzy-based multi-classifier selection module for activity recognition applications

Abstract: Abstract-Performing activity recognition using the information provided by the different sensors embedded in a smartphone face limitations due to the capabilities of those devices when the computations are carried out in the terminal. In this work a fuzzy inference module is implemented in order to decide which classifier is the most appropriate to be used at a specific moment regarding the application requirements and the device context characterized by its battery level, available memory and CPU load. The se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall system activity detection and identification accuracy was 95.5%, while 2.5% of activities were recognized incorrectly, and 2.0% were not detected at all. The achieved accuracies do not differ from those reported in [27,30].…”
Section: Form Of Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The overall system activity detection and identification accuracy was 95.5%, while 2.5% of activities were recognized incorrectly, and 2.0% were not detected at all. The achieved accuracies do not differ from those reported in [27,30].…”
Section: Form Of Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Energy harvesting [23,43,44,45,46,47] Wireless charging [48,18] Sensor set selection [49,50,51,5,52] Deactivate power hungry sensor [42,6,4,20,28,53,54] Context-based pull services [55,33,28] Adaptive sampling rate [7,30,56] On-board computation [8,57,6] Network interface selection [58,59,60,61,62] Computation offloading [24,29,63,64] Opportunistic resources sharing [22,65,26,27] Feature subset selection [66,30] Adaptive classifier selection [67,68,69] Adaptive classifier operations [32,…”
Section: Computation Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al [67] developed a fuzzy-based on-line classifier selection that selects the best-suited classifier given i) offline classifier performance evaluation (trained accuracy, delay, memory need, complexity) ii) online accuracy and delay requirements (low, medium, high) and iii) the current device state (battery level, available memory, CPU load). In practice, given the current application requirements and device state, the fuzzy selector outputs a score indicating the desired quality level of the classification (i.e the desired accuracy, response time, complexity and memory use of an ideal classifier).…”
Section: Adaptive Classifier Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using such system they recognize 25 different activities by matching current accelerometer data with the pre-defined activity set and identified RFID tags. M. Henar, et al [29] use a Google Nexus S accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, light and proximity sensor applied to fuzzy classifier to recognise body position and other activities.…”
Section: Iirelated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%