2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-018-0663-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a model-driven engineering approach for the assessment of non-functional properties using multi-formalism

Abstract: Model-driven techniques can be used to automatically produce formal models from different views of a system realised by using several modelling languages and notations. Specifications are transformed into formal models so facilitating the analysis of complex system for design, validation or verification purposes. However, no single formalism suits for representing all system's views. In particular, the assessment of non-functional properties often requires integrated modelling approaches. The ultimate goal of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the temporal level, the major limitation of the fusion between EEG and fMRI is the difference in their temporal resolutions. From the perspective of temporal-spatial information sharing and fusion, scholars are willing to put more emphasis on the integration of multimodal temporal-spatial information, in which the model-driven and nonmodel-driven are the two most frequently used data fusion methods [17][18][19]. e data collection of EEG and fMRI neuroimaging technologies is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Data Mining Of Human Brain Based On Foca Under Eeg-fmri Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the temporal level, the major limitation of the fusion between EEG and fMRI is the difference in their temporal resolutions. From the perspective of temporal-spatial information sharing and fusion, scholars are willing to put more emphasis on the integration of multimodal temporal-spatial information, in which the model-driven and nonmodel-driven are the two most frequently used data fusion methods [17][18][19]. e data collection of EEG and fMRI neuroimaging technologies is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Data Mining Of Human Brain Based On Foca Under Eeg-fmri Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other approaches that propose different solutions for evaluating nonfunctional properties using models, such as the one by Bernardi et al, 43 who propose the assessment of nonfunctional properties using multiformalism approaches, but they do not address self-adaptive systems. In particular, they are proposing an integrated model to combine performance and reliability models, which allows the construction of models for performance analysis, and automated construction of multiformalism models with less effort.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Bernardi et al [36] defined an approach to integrate different model generation chains. They assume the existence of multiple, independent, transformation chains, each one directly generating a formal model (e.g., SPNs) from a high-level model (e.g., UML).…”
Section: Model-driven Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composition rules become part of model libraries, and only one single model transformation/composition algorithm is defined, which is the same for every library of model templates. Essentially, we use a horizontal intermediate model (between the design-level representation and formal models), whereas Bernardi et al [36] uses a vertical intermediate model (between different transformation chains).…”
Section: Model-driven Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%