2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-38782-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a More Accurate Error Model for BioNano Optical Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This error free Rmap data is used for validating the output of our method. Lastly, deletion, insertion and sizing errors were incorporated into the errorfree Rmaps according to the error model discussed in Li et al [12]. The error model was described earlier in the Background section.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This error free Rmap data is used for validating the output of our method. Lastly, deletion, insertion and sizing errors were incorporated into the errorfree Rmaps according to the error model discussed in Li et al [12]. The error model was described earlier in the Background section.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the limitations of the imaging component of the optical mapping system and the propensity for the DNA to ball up at the ends introduces more sizing error for smaller fragments. Interested readers will nd more details about the causes of these errors in Valouev et al [26] and Li et al [12]. Because of all these experimental conditions, Rmap data generated through optical mapping experiment has insertion (added cut sites) and deletion (missed cut sites) errors along with fragment sizing errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This model was found to be inconsistent with data acquired from latest generation of optical map platforms, namely the Irys System of Bionano Genomics. Li et al (2016) proposed a Laplace distribution function to model the sizing error and showed it to be more consistent with the current technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%