2018
DOI: 10.1108/qae-10-2017-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a more meaningful involvement of librarians in academic program reviews

Abstract: Purpose Using a descriptive case study approach, this paper aims to validate academic librarians’ perceptions that they are marginalized by faculty during academic program reviews, and recommends ways for the two groups to collaborate more effectively to make program reviews more meaningful. Design/methodology/approach The paper describes a case study at a Canadian university where the six types of documents produced as part of the program review process for ten graduate programs were analyzed using corpus an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While corpus methods alone may not be sufficient for research in LIS, they can be used to help triangulate the findings of other methods (e.g. Bowker, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While corpus methods alone may not be sufficient for research in LIS, they can be used to help triangulate the findings of other methods (e.g. Bowker, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic libraries play a critical role in the development of educational, research and productivity services of universities [25,26]. Therefore, librarians are expected to improve their professional performance to achieve these goals [27,28]. The importance of KM in academic libraries has been acknowledged in the recent decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%