A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Abstract: move the explanation of the acronym CAT to the first sentence when you mention it for the first time. DoneIntroduction: first line about the pro-fem theories, it'd be better to use an alternative reference as you go on to discuss pence and paymar in the next sentence. Edit made, reference added.I'd recommend you move your discussion of alternative theories to before you start to discuss CBT. I think these theories need integrating a little more critically into the narrative I'm terms of why these approaches fit better with the work you have done here with this case study. I have moved CBT part to after the other theories but before CAT.Client info -remove the psychosocial background header as I don't think it's needed. Done P9 -I would just use the word weapon rather than specifying the weapon (so the veg peeler) as I think it's the presence of something that could be used as a weapon that's important rather than the actual object. Done Discussion: line one, do you mean CBT rather than DBT in that sentence? Error changed P24 -I'd remove the reference to the Duluth Model, the work you have done here doesn't fit at all with that model (in a very positive way!!). Perhaps include reference to the other models from your introduction? Edited.Conclusion: I still feel this could be slightly stronger and firmer in the originality and contribution but I might be being picky. Slight edits made.Tables: could be reserved better without the horizontal lines. I will leave table format to the journal proofing process -happy for these to be reformatted to fit the journal. This case study presents the assessment and treatment of an adult male offender with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The client's offence involved intimate partner violence and was committed at a time of acute psychiatric relapse.Method: Twelve sessions of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and CAT informed treatment were individually designed to meet the needs of the client, delivered in an in-patient setting in the UK. The client's progress was assessed using psychometric, observational, and narrative/descriptive methods.Results: Psychometric evidence was limited by distorted responding. However, narrative/descriptive assessment indicated that progress had been made in some areas.Recommendations for further treatment were made.
Conclusions:Twelve sessions did not meet all of the client's needs. The use of CAT as a model that his team could use in understanding his violence was conducive to risk management. Overall, insight gained through CAT based psychological intervention contributed to risk reduction.Originality: This case study demonstrates the applicability of CAT to forensic settings.