Towards a new web of rules

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review “institutional experimentation” for protecting workers in response to the contraction of the standard employment relationship and the corresponding rise of “non-standard” forms of paid work. Design/methodology/approach The paper draws on the existing research and knowledge base of the authors as well as a thorough review of the extant literature relating to: non-standard employment contracts; sources of labour supply engaging in non-standard work; exogenous pressures on the employment relationship; intermediaries that separate the management from the control of labour; and entities that subvert the employment relationship. Findings Post-war industrial relations scholars characterised the traditional regulatory model of collective bargaining and the standard employment contract as a “web of rules”. As work relations have become more market mediated, new institutional arrangements have developed to govern these relations and regulate the terms of engagement. The paper argues that these are indicative of an emergent “patchwork of rules” which are instructive for scholars, policymakers, workers’ representatives and employers seeking solutions to the contraction of the traditional regulatory model. Research limitations/implications While the review of the institutional experimentation is potentially instructive for developing solutions to gaps in labour regulation, a drawback of this approach is that there are limits to the realisation of policy transfer. Some of the initiatives discussed in the paper may be more effective than others for protecting workers on non-standard contracts, but further research is necessary to test their effectiveness including in different contexts. Social implications The findings indicate that a task ahead for the representatives of government, labour and business is to determine how to adapt the emergent patchwork of rules to protect workers from the new vulnerabilities created by, for example, employer extraction and exploitation of their individual bio data, social media data and, not far off, their personal genome sequence. Originality/value The paper addresses calls to examine the “institutional intersections” that have informed the changing ways that work is conducted and regulated. These intersections transcend international, national, sectoral and local units of analysis, as well as supply chains, fissured organisational dynamics, intermediaries and online platforms. The analysis also encompasses the broad range of stakeholders including businesses, labour and community groups, nongovernmental organisations and online communities that have influenced changing institutional approaches to employment protection.

Sharing in the gig economy: from equitable work relations to exploitative HRM

“…, 2018, p. 385). Firms often recruit workers as contractors to avoid incurring employment-related costs such as pension contributions and paid leave (Wright et al. , 2018).…”

Pandemics, politics, and the resilience of employment relations research

“…The study of employment relations has centred on understanding the employment relationship and all issues associated with employment (Edwards 2005). Despite the increasingly fragmented nature of the employment relationship due to employers' pursuit of labour flexibility (Rubery 2015), and the decline in the prevalence of the standard employment relationship, heightened by the growth in the gig economy and bogus selfemployment (Wright et al 2019), we argue the term 'employment relations' is still relevant for studying people at work. However, as the opening editorial of this journal reflected (Littler 1987), the study of work relations is broad and has always spanned different methodological and theoretical approaches.…”

Dependent self-employed individuals: are they different from paid employees?

“…Notably, not only individual characteristics but also the economic and social conditions, employment protection legislation and industry-specific factors influence the proportions of dependent self-employed. These structural factors also include levels of labour market flexibilisation, privatisation and the concentration of economic power in global value chains (Muehlberger, 2007a;Rom an et al, 2011;Eichhorst et al, 2013;Moisander et al, 2018;Williams and Horodnic, 2019;Wright et al, 2019).…”