2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a novel regime change framework: Studying mobility transitions in public transport regimes in an Indian megacity

Abstract: Article (Accepted Version) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Ghosh, Bipashyee and Schot, Johan (2019) Towards a novel regime change framework: studying mobility transitions in public transport regimes in an Indian megacity. Energy Research & Social Science, 51. pp. 82-95.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We distinguish five dimensions: 1) technology (products, processes, infrastructures), 2) the demand structure (user preferences), 3) the industry strategy and structure, 4) the policy and politics that sustain the systems and 5) meanings and symbols that make the system culturally attractive. At a deeper level, system change unfolds by changing the various types of rules that are expressed or embedded in the different system dimensions (Grin et al, 2010;Ghosh and Schot, 2019). Rules can be understood in a sociological sense as institutions that constrain and enable actors, and in an evolutionary sense as the genotype (retention structure) of systems.…”
Section: Transformative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We distinguish five dimensions: 1) technology (products, processes, infrastructures), 2) the demand structure (user preferences), 3) the industry strategy and structure, 4) the policy and politics that sustain the systems and 5) meanings and symbols that make the system culturally attractive. At a deeper level, system change unfolds by changing the various types of rules that are expressed or embedded in the different system dimensions (Grin et al, 2010;Ghosh and Schot, 2019). Rules can be understood in a sociological sense as institutions that constrain and enable actors, and in an evolutionary sense as the genotype (retention structure) of systems.…”
Section: Transformative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been recognized that pathways to a new regime do not always systematically evolve upon the emergence of an innovation niche. In this regard, and arguing that a sole focus on transitions from a regime shift reflects a western bias, Ghosh and Schot [21] advocated for the need of more nuanced ways of understanding and analyzing regime-change without relying on niche innovations. By putting more emphasis on change coming from within the regime, these authors mobilized the concept of transformation as one specific pathway of regime change and characterize optimization and transition pathways through changes in trajectories, rules and selection pressures ( Figure 2).…”
Section: From Transitions To Transformation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition, the third pathway, evolves from the three niche-based pathways (reconfiguration and de-alignment and re-alignment) previously defined by Geels and Schot [22]. Following Ghosh and Schot [21] this paper examines changes in socio-technical systems by focusing on actions from regime stakeholders whose actions are considered to contribute to transformation pathways. The transformation pathway recognizes that regime stakeholders are often also heavily invested in optimizing, expanding and improving existing systems in order to address sustainability issues [21].…”
Section: From Transitions To Transformation Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations