2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a quantitative analysis of magnetic force microscopy data matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be seen, the silver cluster creates a conductive path between the Au electrodes. Figure 4(b) represents the optical microscope image of the same sample thatis being characterized, and this particular image was subjected to a mathematical algorithm to enhance the differences between two geometrically registered shots taken before and after electrical characterization [38,39]. The geometrical registration process allows forthecompensation for eventual little misalignments of the two shots; a histogram correction and a conversion to double floating point numbers assigns numerical values to each pixel and allowedus to algebraically sum the frames.…”
Section: Dop Rsd Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen, the silver cluster creates a conductive path between the Au electrodes. Figure 4(b) represents the optical microscope image of the same sample thatis being characterized, and this particular image was subjected to a mathematical algorithm to enhance the differences between two geometrically registered shots taken before and after electrical characterization [38,39]. The geometrical registration process allows forthecompensation for eventual little misalignments of the two shots; a histogram correction and a conversion to double floating point numbers assigns numerical values to each pixel and allowedus to algebraically sum the frames.…”
Section: Dop Rsd Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOKE primarily measures the magnetic hysteresis loop of a magnetic film. However, the MOKE approach cannot determine the magnetic domain distribution and morphology at the same time, which must be obtained by magnetic force microscopy (MFM) (Chiolerio & Allia, ; Fang et al, ; Koblischka & Hartmann, ; Landis et al, ; Lisfi & Lodder, ; Palkar et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hinders the correct interpretation of MFM contrasts around topographic features [Chiolerio and Allia, 2012;Göddenhenrich et al, 1990;Raşa et al, 2002]. Moreover, image processing [Chiolerio et al, 2008[Chiolerio et al, , 2010Panchumarthy et al, 2013;Takekuma et al, 2002;Yu et al, 2003], such as filtering or averaging [Chiolerio and Allia, 2012;Chiolerio et al, 2010;Rastei et al, 2006], on liftmode MFM images may corrupt the entire MFM data with topography. In this chapter, we investigate the effects of these scan height variations and their cancellation via offline corrections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%