2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25126-9_79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Reference Architecture for Mashups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mashup design has been previously considered as ad hoc activity with minimal relation to software engineering practices, architecting or disciplined development (Hartmann, Doorley and Klemmer, 2008). However, our research has been focused on describing disciplined guidelines for mashup development (Salminen, Nyrhinen, Mikkonen and Taivalsaari, 2010) as well as general architecture for mashups (Mikkonen and Salminen, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mashup design has been previously considered as ad hoc activity with minimal relation to software engineering practices, architecting or disciplined development (Hartmann, Doorley and Klemmer, 2008). However, our research has been focused on describing disciplined guidelines for mashup development (Salminen, Nyrhinen, Mikkonen and Taivalsaari, 2010) as well as general architecture for mashups (Mikkonen and Salminen, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous research [7] we introduced a general reference architecture for client-side mashups. There we identified five components of a client-side mashup: content providers, data model, mashup creation, mashup manager, and renderer.…”
Section: A Mashup Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the goal of the paper is to give an extended overview of our experiences on client-side mashup development. This paper is an extended version of our earlier papers (Salminen, Nyrhinen, Mikkonen, & Taivalsaari, 2010;Mikkonen & Salminen, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%