2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9419-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Richer Debate on Tissue Engineering: A Consideration on the Basis of NEST-Ethics

Abstract: In their 2007 paper, Swierstra and Rip identify characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation in the debate about the ethics of new and emerging science and technologies (or "NEST-ethics"). Taking their NEST-ethics structure as a starting point, we considered the debate about tissue engineering (TE), and argue what aspects we think ought to be a part of a rich and high-quality debate of TE. The debate surrounding TE seems to be predominantly a debate among experts. When considering the NEST-ethics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, in practice, it does not always succeed to serve that goal. It has been noted, more often, that public discussion about new technologies often repeats and reaffirms well-known moral points of view in a somewhat mantra-like fashion [21, 28]. This happens also in lay ethics interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Yet, in practice, it does not always succeed to serve that goal. It has been noted, more often, that public discussion about new technologies often repeats and reaffirms well-known moral points of view in a somewhat mantra-like fashion [21, 28]. This happens also in lay ethics interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Of course many other examples can be given of situations in which relations to different future activities provide a different way to look at present activities and the technologies that they give rise to. See, for example, Krabbenborg (2013), Oerlemans et al (2013), and van der Burg (2009).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the excellent efficacy, this strategy is limited by high manufacturing costs and possible security issues (1). In the field of bone tissue engineering, bone marrow is one of the most important source of seed cells, as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow have been universally recognized for their multi-lineage differentiation potentials and reliable reparative capacity (2,3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%