2011 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Data Management 2011
DOI: 10.1109/mdm.2011.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Robust Concurrent and Interleaved Activity Recognition of Mobile Users

Abstract: Abstract-This paper proposes a situation and context-aware complex activity recognition system where we use on-body sensor information along with other context information to infer mobile user activities which are both concurrent and interleaved. We develop and validate our complex activity recognition algorithm for detecting these multiple complex activities. Activities are mapped onto situations using spatio-temporal analysis. We further build a test-bed in the social-networking domain to test and validate o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be when different users perform an activity or when the same user performs it multiple times. Users also tend to interleave between different activities or perform them concurrently [6]. In [5], [7], a context-driven activity theory (CDAT) is used to address the aforementioned challenges such as variation in sequence, concurrency and interleaving to recognize complex activities in home, office and outdoor environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be when different users perform an activity or when the same user performs it multiple times. Users also tend to interleave between different activities or perform them concurrently [6]. In [5], [7], a context-driven activity theory (CDAT) is used to address the aforementioned challenges such as variation in sequence, concurrency and interleaving to recognize complex activities in home, office and outdoor environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%