Proceedings of the 4th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2016
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2016-2437257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Simplified Petrophysical Model for the Vaca Muerta Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective porosity was calibrated by using both well log (black crosses in Figure 9) and gas‐filled porosity (red dots in Figure 9) data (YPF database). Results are consistent with previous studies (Askenazi et al., 2013; Cuervo et al., 2016; Ortiz et al., 2020) and show that the effective porosity increases towards the lower VM (Figure 9). In Well A, this parameter ranges from 5.5% to 12.16% (9.1% average), whereas in Well C effective porosity ranges from 3.24% to 8.44% (6.25% average).…”
Section: Basin and Petroleum System Modelling (Bpsm)supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The effective porosity was calibrated by using both well log (black crosses in Figure 9) and gas‐filled porosity (red dots in Figure 9) data (YPF database). Results are consistent with previous studies (Askenazi et al., 2013; Cuervo et al., 2016; Ortiz et al., 2020) and show that the effective porosity increases towards the lower VM (Figure 9). In Well A, this parameter ranges from 5.5% to 12.16% (9.1% average), whereas in Well C effective porosity ranges from 3.24% to 8.44% (6.25% average).…”
Section: Basin and Petroleum System Modelling (Bpsm)supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Athy's compaction law (Athy, 1930) and a multipoint model (Hantschel and Kauerauf, 2009) were considered for the Vaca Muerta Formation, with porosity values derived from the literature and gasfilled porosity data (Askenazi et al, 2013;Cuervo et al, 2016;Ortiz et al, 2020). The model presented by Spacapan et al (2021) incorporated a Terzaghi-type model to predict the fluid pressure evolution; however, in the present paper, a poro-elastic model was used that incorporates the effects of tectonic compression on the pore pressure calculation.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%