Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3110025.3110082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Social Trust Based Measure of Scientific Productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, to further investigate the innovation speed of preprints with different citation impacts, we categorized the AI preprints into high-impact and low-impact AI preprints based on their citation counts. Specifically, all the AI preprints were ranked in a descending order by citation counts, and the top 20% of them were considered as high-impact, last 40% as low-impact (Gayen, Bhavsar & Chandra, 2017). Besides, according to whether a preprint has been officially published in a journal or a conference, we also classify the AI preprints into two categories, i.e., AI preprints with official version and AI preprints without official version.…”
Section: Classifying Ai Preprints and Their Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, to further investigate the innovation speed of preprints with different citation impacts, we categorized the AI preprints into high-impact and low-impact AI preprints based on their citation counts. Specifically, all the AI preprints were ranked in a descending order by citation counts, and the top 20% of them were considered as high-impact, last 40% as low-impact (Gayen, Bhavsar & Chandra, 2017). Besides, according to whether a preprint has been officially published in a journal or a conference, we also classify the AI preprints into two categories, i.e., AI preprints with official version and AI preprints without official version.…”
Section: Classifying Ai Preprints and Their Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, similar with the AI preprints, we also divided the AI authors into high-influential and lowinfluential AI authors according to their influence, which was represented by the value of "InfluentialCitationCount" from Semantic scholar. In particular, all the AI authors were ranked in a descending order by author influence, and the top 20% of them were marked as high-influential, last 40% as lowinfluential (Gayen, Bhavsar & Chandra, 2017).…”
Section: Classifying Ai Preprints and Their Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust-based complex networks have been used in a plethora of applications [3] such as recommender systems [4], productivity assessments [5], and security mechanisms [6]. Establishments of various trust network models in collaboration networks [5] [7], social ego networks [8], and likewise, has opened various evolutionary multi-layered complex networks to model trust between distinct or similar entities. The first leap towards modeling such trust networks came with modeling of the scale-free [9] www or the world wide web [10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust-based complex networks have been used in a plethora of applications [4] such as recommender systems [5], productivity assessments [6], and security mechanisms [7]. Establishments of various trust network models in collaboration networks [8] [9], social ego networks [9], and likewise, has opened various evolutionary multi-layered complex networks to model trust between distinct or similar entities. The first leap towards modeling such trust networks came with modeling of the scale-free [10] www or the world wide web [11] [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%