Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM

Evans, Chris; Connell, Janice; Barkham, Michael; Margison, Frank; McGrath, Graeme; Mellor‐Clark, John; Audin, Kerry

doi:10.1192/bjp.180.1.51

Cited by 761 publications

(1,023 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

900

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(b) Inventory of Interpersonal Problems -26 (IIP-26;Horowitz, Rosenberg, Baer, Ureno & Villaseñor, 1988) is a self-report measure developed to assess distress about interpersonal difficulties (e.g., intimacy, assertiveness). The 26-item short form was developed by Maling, Gurtman and Howard (1995) Mellor-Clark et al, 1998;Evans et al, 2002) is a standardized 34-item self-report measure of psychological distress using a 5-point anchored frequency scale (ranging from 0: "not at all" to 5: "most or all of the time"), with a one week time frame; extensive psychometric data are available (e.g., Evans et al, 2002). (Internal alpha for this sample was .95.)…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometrics of the Personal Questionnaire: A client-generated outcome measure.

Elliott¹,

Wagner²,

Sales³

et al. 2016

Psychological Assessment

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometrics of the Personal Questionnaire: A client-generated outcome measure.

Elliott¹,

Wagner²,

Sales³

et al. 2016

Psychological Assessment

118

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As well as giving a global measure of distress, information on four different dimensions can be gained, namely: well-being, problems, functioning, and risk. The CORE-OM has an internal consistency () of 0.75-0.95 (Evans et al, 2002).…”

Section: Clinical Outcomes In Routine Evaluation-outcome Measure (Cormentioning

confidence: 99%

Is affect experiencing therapeutic in major depressive disorder? Examining associations between affect experiencing and changes to the alliance and outcome in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy.

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Affect experiencing (AE), defined as the facilitation of client in-session bodily arousal and visceral experiencing of affect, is a distinct theoretical process presumed to contribute to therapeutic improvement. This study examined the role of AE in the treatment of major depressive disorder by exploring its association to client distress and therapeutic alliance on a session-by-session basis. A case series design was used to conduct an intensive analysis of the treatment process of 4 clients who received time-limited intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy, 2 of whom were considered “recovered” and 2 who showed “no change” based upon posttreatment outcomes. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that cross-correlations between AE and client distress discriminated between “recovered” and “no change” clients. In “recovered” clients, there was evidence that higher in-session peak affect experience was associated with reduced distress 7 days later. The results did not provide consistent evidence for a reverse effect, showing that lower distress during the preceding week predicted higher AE in that session. Finally, there was evidence that AE is an in-session activity that can promote the strengthening of the therapeutic alliance. These collective findings suggest that AE is an important treatment process that contributes to alliance formation and psychotherapeutic improvement. Clinical implications include further evidence that psychodynamic therapists can utilize AE as an active change ingredient for depression.

show abstract

“…Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM; Evans et al, 2002). Fue diseñado como medida basal y de resultados en psicoterapia, se empleó una traducción al español de formato autoadministrado.…”

Section: Materialesunclassified

Therapeutic Alliance: Evolution and Relationship With Attachment in Psychotherapy

Rossetti¹,

Botella²

2017

RACP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenRecibido: En estos últimos 20 años la psicoterapia se ha esforzado en fundamentar su práctica clínica a partir de resultados y evidencias sólidas derivadas del rigor científico (Norcross, Beutler y Levant, 2006). Basados en extensas revisiones y meta-análisis sobre los efectos de la psicoterapia, las task forces de la American Psychological Association (APA) concluyeron que la relación terapéutica contribuye de forma sustancial y consistente a los resultados psicoterapéuticos independientemente del tipo de tratamiento. Este vínculo explica el por qué mejoran o no los pacientes al menos tanto como el método particular de tratamiento. La alianza en psicoterapia individual entre otras, ha demostrado ser un elemento efectivo de la relación terapéutica sustentado empíricamen-te (Norcross y Wampold, 2011). Sin embargo, otros autores, aunque reconocen que existe una asociación entre estas variables, plantean que aún existe escasa evidencia que muestre que la alianza terapéutica influye sobre la mejoría sintomática (Muran y Barber, 2010). A pesar de esta controversia, ambas posturas coinciden en la existencia de una correlación entre alianzas fuertes y resultados positivos en psicoterapia.

show abstract

Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM

Abstract: The CORE-OM is a reliable and valid instrument with good sensitivity to change. It is acceptable in a wide range of practice settings.

Cited by 761 publications

References 22 publications

Psychometrics of the Personal Questionnaire: A client-generated outcome measure.

Psychometrics of the Personal Questionnaire: A client-generated outcome measure.

Is affect experiencing therapeutic in major depressive disorder? Examining associations between affect experiencing and changes to the alliance and outcome in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy.

Therapeutic Alliance: Evolution and Relationship With Attachment in Psychotherapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About