2019
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1670143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a structural inequality framework for student retention and success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research is needed to address ways to improve structural competency and structural inequalities in higher education. 37 In this way we will move toward inclusive learning environments and belongingness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research is needed to address ways to improve structural competency and structural inequalities in higher education. 37 In this way we will move toward inclusive learning environments and belongingness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities have long been concerned with equitable access to help promote individual and community-level socioeconomic advancement and drive economic growth (Adnett 2016;Pitman 2017). More recently, the focus has turned to identifying and addressing structural inequalities in access and participation for groups of students, including those from regional backgrounds (Naylor and Mifsud 2020;Tight 2018). Shah, Bennett and Southgate (2015) have highlighted the need to create a sense of belongingness at university for students from regional and/or other equity groups as a means to recruit and retain these students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students may experience major or minor disruptions in their lives that mean taking time out from study is the best option for them, may change their priorities or circumstances away from study, or otherwise have legitimate reasons to take time away from university. However, it is beholden on universities to ensure these students do not face significant barriers should they seek to return to study, particularly where those barriers are entirely within the remit of universities to solve, such as administrative issues or changes to course structures (Naylor & Mifsud, 2019b). Further, universities must be sensitive to the anxieties that are likely to arise from returning to study, particularly if taking a LoA has already made students doubt their ability to succeed at university.…”
Section: Loa As a Risk Factor For Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Tinto's 1975 formulation, external commitments were not an explicit part of the model; these-the personal desires, families, jobs and peers mainly outside the university environmentwere added in Tinto (1993). Further research since then has only served to further highlight the importance of structural or external barriers to student success in higher education (Abbott-Chapman, 2011;Naylor & Mifsud, 2019a, 2019b, while continuing to highlight the importance of integration and having a sense of belonging to the institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%