2010
DOI: 10.1137/090771843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Systematic Linear Stability Analysis of Numerical Methods for Systems of Stochastic Differential Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that the stability behavior for the Euler-Maruyama method (or its generalization obtained by using the θ method for the drift term) applied to these more general test equations is essentially captured by the the linear test equation (2.6). Finally we mention that for non normal drift (2.6) can indeed fail to characterize the stability property (at least in the pre-asymptotic regime) of numerical methods [15,7]. This is already the case in the deterministic setting for the test equation y = λy (see [12,IV.11]).…”
Section: Stability Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It turns out that the stability behavior for the Euler-Maruyama method (or its generalization obtained by using the θ method for the drift term) applied to these more general test equations is essentially captured by the the linear test equation (2.6). Finally we mention that for non normal drift (2.6) can indeed fail to characterize the stability property (at least in the pre-asymptotic regime) of numerical methods [15,7]. This is already the case in the deterministic setting for the test equation y = λy (see [12,IV.11]).…”
Section: Stability Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[26,23] but these studies do not allow for an easy characterization of stability criterion. Another attempt to generalize the linear test equation has been proposed in [7] using the theory of stochastic stabilization and destabilization [18]. Two sets of test equations with d = m = 2 and d = m = 3 have been considered.…”
Section: Stability Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been investigated in [33,29] but these studies do not allow for an easy characterization of stability criterion. Using the theory of stochastic stabilization and destabilization [22] an attempt to generalize the linear test equation has been proposed in [8], where two sets of test equations with N = m = 2 and N = m = 3 have been studied. The conclusion of these studies is that the stability behavior of the EulerMaruyama method (or its generalization obtained by using the θ method for the drift term) is essentially captured by the test equation (12).…”
Section: The Stochastic Scalar Test Equation With Multiplicative Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion of these studies is that the stability behavior of the EulerMaruyama method (or its generalization obtained by using the θ method for the drift term) is essentially captured by the test equation (12). We mention however that for linear systems with a non normal drift, the additional test equations in [8] capture stability behaviors (in particular in the pre asymptotic regime) of a numerical scheme that cannot be seen by studying (12). This phenomenon is well known for ODEs (see [13,IV.11]).…”
Section: The Stochastic Scalar Test Equation With Multiplicative Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for nonlinear SDEs under the global Lipschitz condition, Higham, Mao, and Stuart [9] show that the exponential stability in mean square for the SDE is equivalent to the exponential stability in mean square of the numerical method (e.g., the EulerMaruyama and the stochastic theta method) for sufficiently small step sizes. For further developments in this area, we refer the reader to [5,8,19,22,24,27], for example, and the references therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%