2014
DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2014.11645708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards A Systemic Framework for Digital Forensic Readiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a paper by Mohamed et al, [11] a description is given about a comprehensive approach to identifying the factors that contribute to DFR and how these factors work together to achieve forensic readiness in an organization. In this research, a conceptual framework for organizational forensic readiness was developed, and a future work towards the empirical validation and refinement of the framework was defined.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a paper by Mohamed et al, [11] a description is given about a comprehensive approach to identifying the factors that contribute to DFR and how these factors work together to achieve forensic readiness in an organization. In this research, a conceptual framework for organizational forensic readiness was developed, and a future work towards the empirical validation and refinement of the framework was defined.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Kohn et al [20] proposed the following components of the digital forensic readiness model: evidence collection and preservation policy, information system usage policy, etc. Through the studies of Elyas et al [2] and Kim et al [15], the organization's culture regarding digital forensic investigation, governance structure, etc. was proposed as a component of the digital forensic readiness model; in addition, they proposed policy requirements needed for digital forensic readiness.…”
Section: Digital Forensics Readinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous organizations think of preparation for future security incidents as the lowest-priority task, or generate the results of introducing new digital forensic investigations after security incidents occur because they only consider it as political side of the inside and outside of the organization. Organizations that desire to prepare digital forensic readiness have difficulties in determining the kind of technical readiness required to gain digital forensic capability [2]. In particular, as explained earlier, with the development of ICT technology, organizations that pursue a change into a smart work environment equipped with immediacy need to ensure an appropriate level of readiness with the investment of optimal resources, as it is difficult to invest identical manpower and expenses to the existing work environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a theoretical digital forensics framework that can guide organizations in implementing proactive forensics. Moreover, Elyas et al [20,21] Certain papers have highlighted the need for new tools and digital forensics techniques to investigate anti-forensics methods; these papers have also provided an automation of live investigations. Moreover, a systematic literature review was undertaken by Alharbi [23] in order to identify and map out the existing processes in the digital forensics literature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%