In the present study, a group of high-achieving students is characterized, and the relationship between personality traits, study practices and learning environments is explored. Thirty three engineering students with outstanding academic achievement were assessed using a mixed method approach, consisting of a semi-structured interview and two questionnaires: the NEO-PI-R (Portuguese version) and the Study Skills Scale. The resulting data indicates a convergence between qualitative and quantitative data, associating study practices with personality traits, namely consciousness and deep approach to learning and learning motivation. Participants also revealed to be work oriented, selfdisciplined, determined and highly involved with their academic work.Key words: Academic excellence, Personality, Study practice, Learning environment.
IntroductionOver the past decades, a significant amount of research concerning learning and academic achievement in higher education has been developed. Such endeavour seems to result, at least in part, from the need to deal with global changes occurring in higher education in Europe. The democratization of the access to higher education led to an increasing heterogeneity of students. As a result, it became more and more important to understand the individual differences of students, such as psychological characteristics and study skills, in particular of those students who reach high achievement levels. As Shushok and Hulme (2006) state, "if you want to produce excellence, you have to study excellence. Consequently, I shifted my focus to try to understand what made top achievers tick" (p. 5).The concept of excellence, which translates the idea of superior performance in a specific field, has been studied through different approaches in the literature. Each approach presents a specific key-concept according to its respective framework; some approaches give emphasis to the psychological characteristics of excellent individuals, others are mainly focused on the behaviors and contexts of practice related with outstanding performance. There is also some divergence regarding the identification criteria, with some authors considering the performance or achievement situations (e.g., Araújo, Cruz, & Almeida, 2009;Pearse, 2000;Sękowski & Siekańska, 2008;Taylor, Gould, & Rolo, 2008), and other authors stressing the concept of talent or potential, and using cognitive measures such as the IQ (e.g., Gagné, 2004;Heller, 2004) Therefore, there is still some controversy in relation to the factors determining outstanding performance: on the one hand, there are authors who defend the role of deliberate practice and
97A correspondência relativa a este artigo deverá ser enviada para: Leandro Almeida, Departamento de Psicologia, Instituto de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: leandro@iep.uminho.pt training (Ericsson, Nandagopal, & Roring, 2009;Nandagopal & Ericsson, 2012); on the other hand, there are authors who emphasize the role of several pers...