2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a theoretical framework for analyzing integrated socio-environmental systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, investigating climate as one possible key driver is of great interest in the face of recent anthropogenic climate change (Stocker et al, 2014). Deeper insights in this field are urgently needed to assess the adaptive capacity and dynamics of current societies (Widlok et al, 2012) under global en-vironmental change within the co-evolving planetary socioenvironmental system (Schellnhuber, 1998(Schellnhuber, , 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, investigating climate as one possible key driver is of great interest in the face of recent anthropogenic climate change (Stocker et al, 2014). Deeper insights in this field are urgently needed to assess the adaptive capacity and dynamics of current societies (Widlok et al, 2012) under global en-vironmental change within the co-evolving planetary socioenvironmental system (Schellnhuber, 1998(Schellnhuber, , 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zlinszky and G. Timár: Historic maps as a data source for socio-hydrology Arnell, 2006;Rice et al, 2010;Gilvear, 1999;James, 1999;Endreny, 2001;Widlok et al, 2012). From a human perspective, everyone has a right to safe drinking water and sanitation, and ensuring this under global climate change is a challenge for aquatic sciences (United Nations, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ever increasing human impact on the water cycle combined with the important role of water as a resource in forming human societies has led to the paradigm that the feedback between man and water, water and natural habitats, and natural habitats and man are each bidirectional. This is the framework of socio-environmental studies (Widlok et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until a few decades ago, the disciplinary division of labour and entrenched theoretical assumptions had been restricted to a situation whereby social (human) and the natural environment are investigated independently, so that human-environment interaction appears to be an afterthought and a topic for analysis at some distant point in the future Widlok et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2015b). However, global sustainability challenges have led to the realisation that most natural resource systems embedded in the planetary system, are made of complex, interconnected social, economic, and environmental subsystems (Cornell et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2015b;Steffen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Social-ecological System Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hinkel et al (2014) whenever empirical analysis encompasses many variables, as in typically the case for SESs, it is usually imperative to organise the variables according to their meaning. In this light, this study modified and used the Social-Ecological System framework developed by Chapin et al (2006) By framing the Volta River basin as a coupled SES, this study ultimately contributes to a research perspective that integrates human agency and environmental factors in a single explanatory model (Widlok et al, 2012). Despite the paramount value of the SESF to study coupled SESs like the Volta River Basin, it does not provide specific tools to model the relationship between the key system variables, particularly the dynamic feedback mechanisms that is produced because of the complex interactions between the system variables.…”
Section: Social-ecological System Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%