2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, our study may motivate future investigations of these bodily aspects of psychedelic effects, in consideration of this and other neurophysiological mechanisms. Additionally, a single process early in the neural processing stream (e.g., N100) may further modulate later stages through co‐dependent temporal properties of the signal (Burgess, 2012; Taylor et al, 2019). The disembodiment aspect may also further modulate perception through a lessened corporeal reference and desynchronization of predictive coding (Giummarra, Gibson, Georgiou‐Karistianis, & Bradshaw, 2008; Ho, Preller, & Lenggenhager, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, our study may motivate future investigations of these bodily aspects of psychedelic effects, in consideration of this and other neurophysiological mechanisms. Additionally, a single process early in the neural processing stream (e.g., N100) may further modulate later stages through co‐dependent temporal properties of the signal (Burgess, 2012; Taylor et al, 2019). The disembodiment aspect may also further modulate perception through a lessened corporeal reference and desynchronization of predictive coding (Giummarra, Gibson, Georgiou‐Karistianis, & Bradshaw, 2008; Ho, Preller, & Lenggenhager, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept of interrelated phases of neural processing has been proposed and examined in Taylor et al. (2019), who have shown the feasibility of modeling ERPs as a full sequence of systemic neural processing (N1 → P2 → N2 → P3 → E‐wave) to predict response times (RTs) in a cued Go/NoGo task collected on two sessions in typical developing children using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings not only demonstrated that the stream of neural processes was predictive of task behavior (i.e., averaged response times), but also suggested that the model which simultaneously accounted for trait‐based (e.g., sex and age) as well as session‐specific state measures of sources of individual variability yielded better model fit compared to the model which only accounted for trait measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the adaptive orienting theory proposed by Wessel (2018) and the model structure established by Taylor et al. (2019), we tested four conceptual models (Figure 1) using ERP data collected from typically developing children ages 8–12 years old performing a speeded flanker task. In this study, two types of path models were tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations