2018 18th International Conference on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icter.2018.8615576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a Virtual Garment Fitting Model for Male Upper Body for Online Marketplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis shows that reliable fit & size information is the most important sub-indicator contributing to the customers' technology acceptance, which according to studies such as Hidellaarachchi et al (2018), Shen et al (2019), Misra et al (2018), Saarijärvi et al (2017), and Peng and Al-Sayegh (2014) and the approached online apparel retailers is indeed perceived as the apparel attribute with the most apparel returns. This proves that the Bayesian BWM is indeed a valid method to predict the importance of criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis shows that reliable fit & size information is the most important sub-indicator contributing to the customers' technology acceptance, which according to studies such as Hidellaarachchi et al (2018), Shen et al (2019), Misra et al (2018), Saarijärvi et al (2017), and Peng and Al-Sayegh (2014) and the approached online apparel retailers is indeed perceived as the apparel attribute with the most apparel returns. This proves that the Bayesian BWM is indeed a valid method to predict the importance of criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This can mostly be seen by looking at the alternatives' weights with respect to the second and third most important sub-indicators affecting the users' technology preference which are 'the way of data collection through technology' and 'information handling by online clothing retailers' (see Table 4), implying that privacy and security concerns can occur when using A4 and A3. According to studies conducted by Hidellaarachchi et al (2018) and Apeagyei (2010) customer might perceive discomfort or privacy and security concerns regarding sharing personal body-measurements data and the way body-measurements data can be obtained and used by online apparel retailers. This is also the case for A4 and A3 with nearly all sub-indicators related to the perceived user-friendliness which are responsiveness, search time, availability and required preparatory work time, implying that these two state-of-the-art alternatives are perceived as the least user-friendly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove that drawing the 3D garment pattern by the designer on the parametric model can not only save a lot of time for pattern-making, but also the final pattern-making effect can also satisfy the production requirement of the apparel industry, the strain maps of the virtual try-on 62,63 effect of the prototype based on 3D to 2D flattening drawn on the parametric model (PFPM) (Figure 20(a)), the prototype based on 3D to 2D flattening drawn on the scanned model (no human semantic information) (PFSM) (Figure 20(b)), and the New Bunka prototype (traditional pattern-making method) (Figure 20(c)) 64 have been compared in this section. As shown in Figure 20, the strain map shows the degree of deformation that occurred after the garment was worn on the virtual model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%