Biologically Inspired Design applies natural solutions to engineering challenges. Due to the widespread success of Biologically Inspired Design, we examine the following research question: How does the application, inspiration source, and purpose for applying Biologically Inspired Design (BID) differ between academics, the public, and practitioners? Answering this question can help design the tools used to support Biologically Inspired Design, provide an understanding of the current “State of Biologically Inspired Design”, and identify where Biologically Inspired Design solutions have not been widely utilized. Identifying gaps in utilization could prompt investigation into Biologically Inspired Design methods into new fields. To answer this research question, 660 Biologically Inspired Design samples were gathered equally from three data sources: Google Scholar, Google News, and the Asknature.org “Innovations” database. The data were classified across 7 dimensions and 68 subcategories. The conclusions of our research deliver insights into three areas. First, we identify trends in Biologically Inspired Design independent of source. For example, 72.5% of the biomimicry samples had the purpose of improving functionality and 87.6% of the samples impacted the usage phase of a product’s Life Cycle. Secondly, by examining the distribution of Biologically Inspired Design within each source, we identify areas for potential outreach or application. Finally, by contrasting Biologically Inspired Design results between three sources (academic, news, and practical case studies) we gain an understanding of the disparities between the three. This analysis provides Biologically Inspired Design researchers and practitioners useful insight into the present state of this field, with the goal of motivating future research and application