2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Accurate One-Stage Object Detection With AP-Loss

Abstract: One-stage object detectors are trained by optimizing classification-loss and localization-loss simultaneously, with the former suffering much from extreme foregroundbackground class imbalance issue due to the large number of anchors. This paper alleviates this issue by proposing a novel framework to replace the classification task in one-stage detectors with a ranking task, and adopting the Average-Precision loss (AP-loss) for the ranking problem. Due to its non-differentiability and non-convexity, the APloss … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…regression). To illustrate, AP Loss [60] does not modify the regression branch; however, COCO style AP @0.75 increases around 3%. This example shows that the loss functions for different branches (tasks) are not independent (see also Figure 15).…”
Section: Open Issues For Objective Imbalancementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…regression). To illustrate, AP Loss [60] does not modify the regression branch; however, COCO style AP @0.75 increases around 3%. This example shows that the loss functions for different branches (tasks) are not independent (see also Figure 15).…”
Section: Open Issues For Objective Imbalancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Explanation. Chen et al [60] use all the confidence scores all together without paying attention to this. That's why, there are two possible results: (i) Either the AP Loss is robust to the variations in the meanings of the confidence scores of different classes which can be due to the ranking task it uses, or (ii) if not, then a method sorting the confidence scores in a class specific manner and then combines them to generate the final AP Loss is expected to perform better, which remains as an open problem.…”
Section: Ranking-based Loss Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This manuscript is an extension of our CVPR 2019 paper [36], we make the following contributions. We address the imbalance issue by replacing the classification task in one-stage detectors with a ranking task, so that the class imbalance problem can be handled with Average Precision (AP)-loss, a rank-based loss.…”
Section: Contributions Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illumination-aware faster R-CNN [50] addresses the problem of fusing color and thermal modalities for detecting multispectral images. In the one-stage stream, a considerable number of approaches [51][52][53][54][55] which use anchor mechanism are proposed after SSD [25]. They aim at improving performance, including multi-stage refinement [51,52], adaptive anchors [53] and loss function improvement [54,55].…”
Section: A Anchor-based Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted heatmaps are with the same size as the concatenated feature maps. Note that more complicated detection head like [52,55] can be explored to further improve the detection performance, but it beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: A Overall Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%