2005
DOI: 10.1007/11425274_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Ad-Hoc Rule Semantics for Gene Expression Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying symmetric distance measure, patterns of negatively (inversely) correlated genes can be also discovered by attribute profiles that are hidden by traditional patterns. Also note that our distance measure is close to the semantics of functional (multivalued) dependencies, see [1,13].…”
Section: By Discovering Attribute Profiles a Considerable Number Of mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Applying symmetric distance measure, patterns of negatively (inversely) correlated genes can be also discovered by attribute profiles that are hidden by traditional patterns. Also note that our distance measure is close to the semantics of functional (multivalued) dependencies, see [1,13].…”
Section: By Discovering Attribute Profiles a Considerable Number Of mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This research topic is quite active currently and therefore, additional work can be found, as for example in [49][50][51] and others.…”
Section: Gene Expression Data Analysis Using Rule Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], we proposed three new semantics for gene expression data and show their biological interests. In [2,4], we did a first step toward a formal framework with a first generic definition of a semantics and the notion of a well-formed semantics. In this paper, we go a step beyond by giving a new syntactical characterization of a wellformed semantics, leading to the theorem 1.…”
Section: Related Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a data mining context, error and quality measures can be integrated a posteriori to sort and to qualify the rules. Furthermore, we focus on those semantics verifying Armstrong's axioms, so-called "well-formed semantics" [4], i.e. semantics for rules on which Armstrong's axiom system applies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%