2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an automated SAR-based flood monitoring system: Lessons learned from two case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
219
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
219
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Better results would require data with high spatial resolution. The detection of smaller water surfaces has been reported also in [18,20,35,51]. They can be detected by the use of images with higher spatial resolution, such as X band SAR data [20,29,31,32,36].…”
Section: Grassland Floods (Intra-field Scale)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better results would require data with high spatial resolution. The detection of smaller water surfaces has been reported also in [18,20,35,51]. They can be detected by the use of images with higher spatial resolution, such as X band SAR data [20,29,31,32,36].…”
Section: Grassland Floods (Intra-field Scale)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that SAR imagery offers the possibilities to obtain distributed remote-sensing-derived water levels over a large area with sufficient accuracy for calibration of a hydraulic model. Matgen et al (2011) proposed a hybrid approach to automatically extract flood extent from SAR images by estimating the statistical distribution of open water backscatter values from SAR images of floods, radiometric thresholding to extract the core of the water bodies, and region growing to extract all water bodies. They proposed a change detection procedure using pre-or post-flood SAR reference images to remove over-detection of inundated areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Grady et al (2011) conclude that misclassification due to low backscatter values from non-flooded areas can be reduced via image differencing approaches. Matgen et al (2011) and Giustarini et al (2012) present a method relying on the calibration of a statistical distribution of "open water" backscatter values inferred from SAR images of floods. Given the many circumstances that can affect classification results, it is difficult to derive a consistent classification technique that, ideally, also includes an error or accuracy assessment, and for all incidence angles.…”
Section: Relative Advantages Of Sar and Optical Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%