Towards an Evaluation of a Metadata Standard for Generative Virtual Museums

Sacher, Danièl; Weyers, Benjamin; Biella, Daniel; Luther, Wolfram

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13102-3_59

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Evaluation can be performed through empirical assessment, for example, collected in a collaborative project in which museum stakeholders, curators, visitors (of different experience levels), and domain experts assess the subjective reliability of a ViM domain. In [ 45 ] ( Appendix A ), a questionnaire for curators on this phase of exhibition design development is presented. It consists of 56 items “to gather relevant information about the collections, digitization and metadata techniques and interoperability standards used by the corresponding institution as well as to determine possible use case scenarios for virtual museums and relevant feature sets for future curator tool implementations”.…”

Section: Results On Dt Types Emerging Technologies and Sensor Classesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the museums included, 53% are operated under public administration, 43% are operated privately and 4% have a private and a public governing board. Further museum type definitions, collection related tasks and other terms used in museum statistics are highlighted in [ 45 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Below, we list important groups in the context of (virtual) museums with examples (cf. [ 39 ]): Strictly ViM formats: Virtual Museum and Cultural Object Exchange Format (ViM-COX) [ 45 ], Europeana Data Model [ 77 ], and TourML [ 78 ], an XML schema that describes the structure, content and experience of a ViM mobile tour (navigation supporting the feature communication); Museum standard LIDO (lightweight information describing objects) is the successor of the metadata exchange format museumdat and was inspired by CDWA Lite and SPECTRUM [ 79 ]; LIDO is CIDOC CRM (Comité International pour la Documentation−Conceptual Reference Model) compliant and can be used to document properties of all kinds of cultural heritage; Architectural standards: CAD, IFC/BIM, CityGML/ IndoorGML developed by Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) (addressing the feature physical structure, content [ 80 ]); Educational metadata standard: IEEE Learning Object Model (addressing the feature learning) [ 81 ]. …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Strictly ViM formats: Virtual Museum and Cultural Object Exchange Format (ViM-COX) [ 45 ], Europeana Data Model [ 77 ], and TourML [ 78 ], an XML schema that describes the structure, content and experience of a ViM mobile tour (navigation supporting the feature communication);…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A reason for this might be that this conceptualization tends to focus industry and IT attention on the needs of museums, galleries, gardens, and libraries, and brings to reality the long-demanded development of curatorial tools for planning, designing, generating, and maintaining exhibitions [ 45 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Digital Twins and Enabling Technologies in Museums and Cultural Heritage: An Overview

Luther

Baloian

Biella

et al. 2023

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an overview of various types of virtual museums (ViM) as native artifacts or as digital twins (DT) of physical museums (PM). Depending on their mission and features, we discuss various enabling technologies and sensor equipment with their specific requirements and complexities, advantages and drawbacks in relation to each other at all stages of a DT’s life cycle. A DT is a virtual construct and embodies innovative concepts based on emerging technologies (ET) using adequate sensor configurations for (meta-)data import and exchange. Our keyword-based search for articles, conference papers, (chapters from) books and reviews yielded 43 contributions and 43 further important references from Industry 4.0, Tourism and Heritage 4.0. After closer examination, a reference corpus of 40 contributions was evaluated in detail and classified along with their variants of DT—content-, communication-, and collaboration-centric and risk-informed ViMs. Their system features correlate with different application areas (AA), new or improved technologies—mostly still under development—and sensors used. Our proposal suggests a template-based, generative approach to DTs using standardized metadata formats, expert/curator software and customers’/visitors’ engagement. It advocates for stakeholders’ collaboration as part of a comprehensive validation and verification assessment (V&VA) throughout the DT’s entire life cycle.

show abstract

Section: Results On Dt Types Emerging Technologies and Sensor Classesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Digital Twins and Enabling Technologies in Museums and Cultural Heritage: An Overview

Luther

Baloian

Biella

et al. 2023

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An Integrative Tool Chain for Collaborative Virtual Museums in Immersive Virtual Environments

Sacher

Weyers

Kuhlen

et al. 2015

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Más allá de los datos: la transformación digital del museo tradicional

Sans Pinillos,

Costa

2023

Daimon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work focuses on the virtual museum, understood as the digital transformation of the traditional museum. First, the main conceptualizations of the virtual museum in the specialized literature are reviewed, and based on them, we propose a basic definition. Furthermore, we argue in favor of the insufficiency of the dataist perspective in the study of epistemic injustice associated with the virtual museum. Finally, the exclusion related to the participation and interaction between a museum’s visitors and the institution is analyzed. Este trabajo se centra en el museo virtual entendido como la transformación digital del museo tradicional. En primer lugar, se revisan las principales conceptualizaciones del museo virtual en la literatura especializada y, a partir de las mismas, se propone una definición básica. Asimismo, se presentan argumentos que muestran la insuficiencia de la perspectiva dataísta en el estudio de la injusticia epistémica relativa al museo virtual. Finalmente, se analiza la exclusión relativa a la participación y la interacción entre las visitantes de un museo (tanto virtual como físico) y la propia institución.

show abstract

Towards an Evaluation of a Metadata Standard for Generative Virtual Museums

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Digital Twins and Enabling Technologies in Museums and Cultural Heritage: An Overview

Digital Twins and Enabling Technologies in Museums and Cultural Heritage: An Overview

An Integrative Tool Chain for Collaborative Virtual Museums in Immersive Virtual Environments

Más allá de los datos: la transformación digital del museo tradicional

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About