28th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2006. 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iti.2006.1708469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an integrated acceptance model for software frameworks literature review and proposed solution

Abstract: Software frameworks have potential to substantially improve software developer productivity and software quality when applying product line approach. Beside costly development of in-house frameworks, many qualitative proprietary and open source frameworks are available on the web. Framework users should be able to review and select the best available framework, to maximize number of reuses and consequently get better framework's cost/benefit ratio.On the other side, framework developers need to develop highly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may cost too much for stakeholders if serious open source module crashes halfway over the development phase of a marketable software [5]. Most of OSS projects do not achieve maturity, that indicates developmental issues [6]. To stay practical, several OSS projects require a steady involvement of fresh volunteers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may cost too much for stakeholders if serious open source module crashes halfway over the development phase of a marketable software [5]. Most of OSS projects do not achieve maturity, that indicates developmental issues [6]. To stay practical, several OSS projects require a steady involvement of fresh volunteers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the unique challenges is the sheer number of open source projects. Anyone can create an open source project on free hosting sites such as SourceForge.net and many of these projects are very immature (Polancic, Horvat, & Rozman, 2004). Another challenge is that open source software rarely provides documentation (Wheeler, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%