2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Ontology for Privacy Requirements via a Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several papers address privacy requirements as a special case of security requirements, but this approach overlooks fundamental privacy goals [23]. Privacy is a concept that can be confused with security: "conceptually and methodologically privacy is often confounded with security" [22] and "the common misperception is that information security equates to privacy" [20].…”
Section: Background To Pbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers address privacy requirements as a special case of security requirements, but this approach overlooks fundamental privacy goals [23]. Privacy is a concept that can be confused with security: "conceptually and methodologically privacy is often confounded with security" [22] and "the common misperception is that information security equates to privacy" [20].…”
Section: Background To Pbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology-based approaches to privacy protection have been proposed in e.g. [1,[6][7][8], but the idea of creating privacy policies through a process of negotiation is mostly absent in these related works, as is that of data owners working in cooperation with data analysts. Our work can thus be viewed as filling a gap at the intersection of the domains of knowledge discovery, collaboration and privacy.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piolle et al [17] proposed a user-centered privacy management that deals with the privacy policy. Gharib et al [24] presents an ontology for privacy requirements for systems that deal with personal information.…”
Section: Quality Management In Agent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%