2014 Sixth International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt 2014
DOI: 10.1109/mtd.2014.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Ontology of Terms on Technical Debt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
107
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A poor identification and management of TD can bring significant losses to a software project [9]. Different types of TD can occur throughout the phases of a software development process [2]. One of them is documentation debt, which refers to issues encountered in the software project documentation that can be identified by locating missing, inadequate or incomplete artefacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A poor identification and management of TD can bring significant losses to a software project [9]. Different types of TD can occur throughout the phases of a software development process [2]. One of them is documentation debt, which refers to issues encountered in the software project documentation that can be identified by locating missing, inadequate or incomplete artefacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For training purposes, we performed a presentation in the first part of the class. The presentation covered the TD concepts and context, as well as the TD indicators (Alves et al, 2014) and how to perform a qualitative analysis on the code comments. This training took one hour.…”
Section: Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed as a criterion the strategy that supports decisions about when and if a TD item should be paid; • Types of TD Related to the Decision-making Criteria (RQ2): this category lists the types of TD that were related to any criterion in the studies. We used the types of debt proposed by Alves et al (2014); • Empirical Evaluation (RQ3): we verified whether the proposed criterion has been evaluated through empirical methods and, if so, which method was used. We considered that a study has an empirical evaluation if it brings at least one section with some discussion dedicated to this topic.…”
Section: Classification Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the very broad specifications given on the categories of technical debt in Li et al [7] or Alves et al [1], in the integration and integration testing process alone, all possible technical debts could be identified. As, this does not provide a statement on how much e↵ort it would take to repay the respective debt, neither about if it has an e↵ect on the business value of the company, this is not considered as a severe problem.…”
Section: Technical Debtmentioning
confidence: 99%