2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022wr032233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Optimal Representation of Sub‐Grid Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models

Abstract: One of the persistent challenges of Land Surface Models (LSMs) is to determine a realistic yet efficient sub‐grid representation of heterogeneous landscapes. This is particularly important in emulating the fine‐scale and nonlinear interactions between water, energy, and biogeochemical fluxes at the land surface. In LSMs, landscape heterogeneity can be represented using sub‐grid tiling techniques, which partition macroscale grid cells (e.g., 1°) into smaller units or “tiles.” However, there is currently no form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method used is described in greater detail in Torres‐Rojas et al. (2022), with the decay cutoff in our case as 5% of the variance. This particular cutoff is chosen to produce a wide range of values for different surfaces without saturating at either end of the range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used is described in greater detail in Torres‐Rojas et al. (2022), with the decay cutoff in our case as 5% of the variance. This particular cutoff is chosen to produce a wide range of values for different surfaces without saturating at either end of the range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the significant advances regarding tiling schemes over the last decade, many issues persist, including the fact that over large-scale domains, LSM sub-grid outputs are mostly only summarized and evaluated via macroscale grid statistics: spatial mean and variance. Although informative, these statistics are insensitive to the tiles' large-scale spatial patterns (i.e., patternagnostic metrics) (Jupp & Twiss, 2006;Torres-Rojas et al, 2022). This issue is critical as emerging work shows the importance of correctly representing the sub-grid spatio-temporal patterns of surface states to explain the role of sub-grid heterogeneity on atmospheric response (Simon et al, 2021).…”
Section: Model Evaluation: Spatially Distributed Hydrological Models ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the multi-scale spatial heterogeneity of the physical environment (e.g., vegetation, soils, elevation, and land use) has been acknowledged manuscript submitted to JGR: Atmospheres to influence the spatial and temporal distribution of the fluxes in a nonlinear manner (Dickinson, 1995;R. A. Fisher & Koven, 2020;Koch et al, 2017;Nicholson, 1988;Simon et al, 2021;Tesfa et al, 2014;Torres-Rojas et al, 2022;Vergopolan et al, 2022). Besides, it is widely recognized that certain fluxes and associated processes and variables tend to recur and appear consistently across different scales in space, time, or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is further complicated in highly segregated landscapes where multiple PFTs, located within the same model grid cell, interact through the shared resources (e.g., soil water). While previous studies have tackled the challenge of representing sub-grid heterogeneity to understand the impacts of topographical gradients (Tesfa & Leung, 2017), hydrological processes (Torres-Rojas et al, 2022), or vegetation types (Ke et al, 2013) on the estimation of energy and water fluxes, no study has yet evaluated the impact of sub-grid heterogeneity on the simulated plant water stress in LSMs. In particular, the effect of homogenizing PHTs within single PFTs and/or across the landscape on the simulated plant water stress is still poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%