2019
DOI: 10.1101/511964
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an optimised processing pipeline for diffusion MRI data: Effects of artefact corrections on diffusion metrics and their age associations in UK Biobank

Abstract: Increasing interest in the structural and functional organization of the human brain in health and disease encourages the acquisition of big datasets consisting of multiple neuroimaging modalities accompanied by additional information obtained from health records, cognitive tests, biomarkers and genotypes. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging data enables a range of promising imaging phenotypes probing structural connections as well as macroanatomical and microstructural properties of the brain. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another problem is an image manipulation and data processing related to the brains with massive lesions and severe deformations [72]. Currently, there is no reliable method of DKI/DTI post-processing similar to reference [73], which allows one to validate and verify a robustness of numerical algorithms in the case of heavy brain deformation/deflection. Thus, it might introduce a larger variability in the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem is an image manipulation and data processing related to the brains with massive lesions and severe deformations [72]. Currently, there is no reliable method of DKI/DTI post-processing similar to reference [73], which allows one to validate and verify a robustness of numerical algorithms in the case of heavy brain deformation/deflection. Thus, it might introduce a larger variability in the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion MRI processing was performed as follows: for each subject the two dMRI acquisitions were first concatenated and then denoised using a Marchenko-Pastur-PCA-based algorithm (Veraart et al, 2016; Veraart et al, 2016b); the eddy current, head movement and EPI geometric distortions were corrected using outlier replacement and slice-to-volume registration with TOPUP and EDDY (Andersson et al, 2003; Smith et al, 2004; Andersson and Sotiropoulos, 2016; Andersson et al, 2016; Andersson et al, 2017); bias field inhomogeneity correction was performed by calculating the bias field of the mean b0 volume and applying the correction to all the volumes (Tustison et al, 2010). This framework only differs from the optimal pipeline for diffusion preprocessing presented in Maximov et al (2019) in that we did not perform the final smoothing or the gibbs-ring removal (Kellner et al, 2016) due to the nature of the data (partial fourier space acquisition).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%