2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of So 2019
DOI: 10.1109/robomech.2019.8704816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an unsupervised morphological segmenter for isiXhosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also experimented with inserting a segment boundary based on whether the entropy increases between adjacent positions, as well as an objective that compares the sum of the left and right entropies to the mean over all the entropies in the word to perform relatively thresholding. These are similar to objective functions proposed by Mzamo et al (2019b). However, in our experiments the constant entropy objective performed substantially better than either of those approaches.…”
Section: Entropy-based Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We also experimented with inserting a segment boundary based on whether the entropy increases between adjacent positions, as well as an objective that compares the sum of the left and right entropies to the mean over all the entropies in the word to perform relatively thresholding. These are similar to objective functions proposed by Mzamo et al (2019b). However, in our experiments the constant entropy objective performed substantially better than either of those approaches.…”
Section: Entropy-based Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In an unsupervised segmentation approach, the algorithm models from raw texts to produce respective segments. For this kind of technique, Mzamo et al (2019) (2015) have leveraged this dataset to develop surface segmentation models. Among these, Cotterell et al ( 2015) stand out as they not only developed a system called CHIPMUNK but also rigorously evaluated its performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When widening the search for related literature further, we see that there exists a verb parser and generator (Pretorius et al (2017)), morphological analysers (Pretorius & Bosch (2009), ), morphological segmenters (e.g., Mzamo et al (2019), Moeng et al (2021)), language models (e.g., Myoya et al (2023)), and a Grammatical Framework (GF) grammar…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%