Grouting and Deep Mixing 2012 2012
DOI: 10.1061/9780784412350.0122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Better Injection Control and Verification of Rock Grouting

Abstract: Traditionally, closure criteria and control of grouting effectiveness for bedrock permeation grouting has always relied on "final stage" confirmatory water pressure testing of the grouted rock mass using classic Lugeon-style testing. However, increasing industry-wide acceptance of real-time grout monitoring using electronic data acquisition can allow adoption of closure criteria using grouting data alone, without recourse to additional water pressure testing. This use of electronic data is facilitated by three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another method to detect hydraulic jacking that could be used as a complement is to continuously monitor, for example, flows, pressures, and apparent Lugeon values; owing to the increased use of computer monitoring in the grouting industry in the past decade, such approaches have improved rapidly (Wilson 2012;Bruce 2012). Wilson (2012) gives examples of application of apparent Lugeon theory; two other grouting approaches based on monitoring are the Aperture Control Grouting approach (Bonin et al 2012;Carter et al 2012) and the Real Time Grouting Control method (Rafi and Stille 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Maximum Acceptable Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method to detect hydraulic jacking that could be used as a complement is to continuously monitor, for example, flows, pressures, and apparent Lugeon values; owing to the increased use of computer monitoring in the grouting industry in the past decade, such approaches have improved rapidly (Wilson 2012;Bruce 2012). Wilson (2012) gives examples of application of apparent Lugeon theory; two other grouting approaches based on monitoring are the Aperture Control Grouting approach (Bonin et al 2012;Carter et al 2012) and the Real Time Grouting Control method (Rafi and Stille 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Maximum Acceptable Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preoccupation of a designer is to define an attainable objective. This latter is often formulated in term of a minimal spread at a prescribed pressure that is generally the maximal allowable injection pressure [14]. The value of the flow rate at the minimal required spread and the maximal allowable pressure is the flow rate limit.…”
Section: Minimal Flow Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the execution of the project, the reported variations in the GIN and the maximum pressure were introduced to reduce the risk of displacement of the foundation caused by unnecessary grout injection. The inefficiency of this procedure has been illustrated by Bonin et al (2012). They recognized extensive signs of jacking in registered data and thus emphasized the need for controlling hydro jacking in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%