2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3203(02)00034-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards better making a decision in speaker verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two main approaches can be utilized in this endeavor. The first is known as client-specific decision [9] [16] [3] . This technique substitutes the global match threshold criteria of traditional biometric systems with a decision boundary that is allowed to fluctuate based on individual user match characteristics.…”
Section: Biometric Menagerie Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two main approaches can be utilized in this endeavor. The first is known as client-specific decision [9] [16] [3] . This technique substitutes the global match threshold criteria of traditional biometric systems with a decision boundary that is allowed to fluctuate based on individual user match characteristics.…”
Section: Biometric Menagerie Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the intra-ethnical distributions are also included for comparison purposes. These subsets were obtained by applying Equation 3 and Equation 2 to the dataset described in Section 4. …”
Section: Inter-ethnical Imposter Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the following three ways have been used to deal with the score variability: client-specific threshold, clientspecific fusion and client-specific score normalization [7]. In client-specific threshold, each user has a different threshold [8], which can be a function of a global threshold [9]. However, the decision threshold has to be tuned for each user separately making it difficult for large population applications.…”
Section: λ(X Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User-specific processing is done either by user-specific normalization [7], [8], user-specific threshold setting [9], user-specific fusion [10], [8] and user-specific template update [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%