“…For the quantitative studies, only a small proportion are contextualized in the institutional setting (Ngo, Lau, & Foley, 2008; Wei & Lau, 2011), or include institutional actors and industrial/employment relations as an element of the research, even though employment/labor market conditions in China vary significantly across industrial sectors and differ between China and other economies, which may influence the effect of SHRM practices (Lepak et al, 2007). Yang et al's (2019) study that explores the relationships between HPWS, trade unions and employee well‐being is one of the few exceptions. Similarly, Zhou, Fan and Son's (2019, p. 253) study of 108 firms and 1,250 employees offers another good example that bridges the HRM and employment relations literature by “investigating how human capital and employee participation, direct voice mechanism, and corporate governance participation jointly moderate the relationship between HPWS and organizational innovation.” By contrast, qualitative SHRM studies are generally better contextualized (Zhang & Albrecht, 2010).…”