Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism

Abstract

The Snowden leaks, first published in June 2013, provided unprecedented insights into the operations of state-corporate surveillance, highlighting the extent to which everyday communication is integrated into an extensive regime of control that relies on the 'datafication' of social life. Whilst such data-driven forms of governance have significant implications for citizenship and society, resistance to surveillance in the wake of the Snowden leaks has predominantly centred on techno-legal responses relating to the development and use of encryption and policy advocacy around privacy and data protection. Based on in-depth interviews with a range of social justice activists, we argue that there is a significant level of ambiguity around this kind of anti-surveillance resistance in relation to broader activist practices, and critical responses to the Snowden leaks have been confined within particular expert communities. Introducing the notion of 'data justice', we therefore go on to make the case that resistance to surveillance needs to be (re)conceptualized on terms that can address the implications of this data-driven form of governance in relation to broader social justice agendas. Such an approach is needed, we suggest, in light of a shift to surveillance capitalism in which the collection, use and analysis of our data increasingly comes to shape the opportunities and possibilities available to us and the kind of society we live in.

Workers of the Internet unite? Online freelancer organisation among remote gig economy workers in six Asian and African countries

“…The work organisation in online freelancing leads to self-organisation tending to take the form of social media groups, while microworkers tend to place greater importance on forums. It is important to be aware of the implications this difference may have: a particular concern is whether Facebook's realname policy and reputation for surveillance could have a chilling effect on more radical worker organising and action (Dencik et al, 2016;Geelan and Hodder, 2017).…”

Practicing environmental data justice: From DataRescue to Data Together

“…In line with critical counter‐data and counter‐mapping approaches, data justice scholars have called for rethinking data studies within a social justice framework. Multi‐disciplinary research has emphasised the disciplining aspects of data through surveillance constraining social movements (Dencik et al., ), data‐driven governance entrenching power asymmetries (Johnson, ), and data technologies making the poor visible (Heeks & Renken, ). Taylor () calls for establishing a common direction in future data justice research to account for how data can lead to discrimination, discipline and control; acknowledge both the positive and negative possibilities of data; and apply across social contexts.…”

Big Data-Driven Health Surveillance

“…While rejecting techno-deterministic as well as substantive views 11 , I unpack interdependencies between technological developments, corporate data practices and big datadriven health research, specifically in the field of public health surveillance. In consequence, this book inevitably grapples with emerging power asymmetries (Sharon 2016;Andrejevic 2014) and questions of data (in-)justice (Taylor 2017;Dencik, Hintz and Cable 2016;Heeks and Renken 2016) crucial to CDS.…”

“…It examines significant economic, political, ethical, and legal issues, as well as matters of social justice concerning data (Taylor 2017;Dencik, Hintz and Cable 2016). While most companies have come to see, use and promote data as a major economic asset, allegedly comparable to oil, CDS emphasises that data are not a mere commodity (see also Thorp 2012).…”